{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","title":"Capitalist Realism - Is There no Alternative","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9781846943171","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","id":"4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","uuid":"4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","title":"Capitalist Realism - Is There no Alternative","normalized_title":"capitalistrealismistherenoalternative","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9781846943171","isbns":["9781846943171"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":88,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Capitalist%20Realism%20-%20Is%20There%20no%20Alternative","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":28,"pdf_page":33,"physical_index":33,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"efa7f6f35bfd7d4dba4cbd4555cf875a05fd566b47ba15edf9e5290b35a99223"},"chapter":"MARK FISHER CAPITALIST REALISM IS THERE NO ALTERNATIVE?","content":"against fixed hierarchy.\n\nTaken together, the immobilizers, with their implicit concession that capitalism can only be resisted, never overcome, and the liberal communists, who maintain that the amoral excesses of capitalism must be offset by charity, give a sense of the way in which capitalist realism circumscribes current political possibilities. Whereas the immobilizers retain the form of 68-style protest but in the name of resistance to change, liberal communists energetically embrace newness. Žižek is right to argue that, far from constituting any kind of progressive corrective to official capitalist ideology, liberal communism constitutes the dominant ideology of capitalism now. 'Flexibility', 'nomadism' and 'spontaneity' are the very hallmarks of management in a post-Fordist, Control society. But the problem is that any opposition to flexibility and decentralization risks being self-defeating, since calls for inflexibility and centralization are, to say the least, not likely to be very galvanizing.\n\nIn any case, resistance to the 'new' is not a cause that the left can or should rally around. Capital thought very carefully about how to break labor; yet there has still not yet been enough thought about what tactics will work against capital in conditions of post-Fordism, and what new language can be innovated to deal with those conditions. It is important to contest capitalism's appropriation of 'the new', but to reclaim the 'new' can't be a matter of adapting to the conditions in which we find ourselves – we've done that rather too well, and 'successful adaptation' is the strategy of managerialism par excellence.\n\nThe persistent association of neoliberalism with the term 'Restoration', favored by both Badiou and David Harvey, is an important corrective to the association of capital with novelty. For Harvey and Badiou, neoliberal politics are not about the new, but a return of class power and privilege. '[I]n France,' Badiou has said, 'Restoration' refers to the period of the return of the King, in 1815, after the Revolution and Napoleon. We are in such a period. Today we see liberal capitalism and its political system, parliamentarianism, as the only natural and acceptable solutions'. Harvey argues that neoliberalization is best conceived of as a 'political project to re-establish the conditions for capital accumulation and to restore the power of economic elites'. Harvey demonstrates that, in an era popularly described as 'post-political', class war has continued to be fought, but only by one side: the wealthy. 'After the implementation of neoliberal policies in the late 1970s,'Harvey reveals,\n\nCapitalist Realism\n\n28","previous_page":27,"next_page":29}