{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","title":"Capitalist Realism - Is There no Alternative","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9781846943171","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","id":"4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","uuid":"4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","title":"Capitalist Realism - Is There no Alternative","normalized_title":"capitalistrealismistherenoalternative","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9781846943171","isbns":["9781846943171"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":88,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Capitalist%20Realism%20-%20Is%20There%20no%20Alternative","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":77,"pdf_page":82,"physical_index":82,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"6b617462711479256e20fbfd1dcc0ec927c271613b111341254ac0d27ddac110"},"chapter":"MARK FISHER CAPITALIST REALISM IS THERE NO ALTERNATIVE?","content":"the Brezhnevite Soviet state, meaning that the USSR acted as a cultural entrepreneur for Hollywood. Since it is now clear that a certain amount of stability is necessary for cultural vibrancy, the question to be asked is: how can this stability be provided, and by what agencies?\n\nIt's well past time for the left to cease limiting its ambitions to the establishing of a big state. But being 'at a distance from the state' does not mean either abandoning the state or retreating into the private space of affects and diversity which Žižek rightly argues is the perfect complement to neoliberalism's domination of the state. It means recognizing that the goal of a genuinely new left should be not be to take over the state but to subordinate the state to the general will. This involves, naturally, resuscitating the very concept of a general will, reviving – and modernizing - the idea of a public space that is not reducible to an aggregation of individuals and their interests. The 'methodological individualism' of the capitalist realist worldview presupposes the philosophy of Max Stirner as much as that of Adam Smith or Hayek in that it regards notions such as the public as 'spooks', phantom abstractions devoid of content. All that is real is the individual (and their families). The symptoms of the failures of this worldview are everywhere – in a disintegrated social sphere in which teenagers shooting each other has become commonplace, in which hospitals incubate aggressive superbugs – what is required is that effect be connected to structural cause. Against the postmodernist suspicion of grand narratives, we need to reassert that, far from being isolated, contingent problems, these are all the effects of a single systemic cause: Capital. We need to begin, as if for the first time, to develop strategies against a Capital which presents itself as ontologically, as well as geographically, ubiquitous.\n\nDespite initial appearances (and hopes), capitalist realism was not undermined by the credit crisis of 2008. The speculations that capitalism might be on the verge of collapsing soon\n\nMarxist Supernanny\n\n77","previous_page":76,"next_page":78}