{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","title":"分裂分析德勒兹 先验经验论与建构主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","id":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","uuid":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","title":"分裂分析德勒兹 先验经验论与建构主义","normalized_title":"分裂分析德勒兹先验经验论与建构主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":327,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%88%86%E8%A3%82%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%20%E5%85%88%E9%AA%8C%E7%BB%8F%E9%AA%8C%E8%AE%BA%E4%B8%8E%E5%BB%BA%E6%9E%84%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/search"},"page":{"printed_page":151,"pdf_page":182,"physical_index":182,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"8ffcf9f8a1863bfb81800a198e1d13c2cbd5322620a96ae718aa26bafc47a9d1"},"chapter":"第二章 空间","content":"图表就是混沌、灾难，但也是秩序或节奏的芽点。相对于具象的予料，这是暴烈的混沌，但相对于绘画的崭新秩序，这是节奏的芽点；它“开启了可感的领域”，培根这么说。图表结束了预备工作且开始绘画行动。没有画家不造成这种混沌一芽点的经验，在此他什么都再也看不到，且濒临自我摧毁：视觉坐标的崩溃。这并非是心理学的经验，而是确切的图画经验，即使它可能对于画家的心理生活有巨大的影响。[1]\n\n图表是局部与暂时的纯粹混沌，大写形象即将由这里诞生，但布置却不是混沌，而是某一历史断代中的力量特异性构成，它亦是暂时的但却决定着某一时代的存在如何“自我建构成可以且必须被思考的问题性”[2]。对德勒兹而言，图表是“差异的可能起源”，创新的节奏与秩序将由此萌芽，但图表不是秩序，反而是一切秩序的摧毁与缺席。与此相对的，福柯的布置则是一种“历史先天”(apriorihistorique)，它决定着某一考古学地层中的存在如何可以被思考，是真理与主体性的构成。\n\n第二章 空间\n\n[1] FB, 67.\n\n[2] Foucault, Michel, L'usage des plaisirs. Paris : Gallimard, 1984, 17-18.也可 以参考杨凯麟，《分裂分析福柯》，《主体转型的未定条件》一节，南京大学出版社，2011，26-33。\n\n151","previous_page":150,"next_page":152}