{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","title":"分裂分析德勒兹 先验经验论与建构主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","id":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","uuid":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","title":"分裂分析德勒兹 先验经验论与建构主义","normalized_title":"分裂分析德勒兹先验经验论与建构主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":327,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%88%86%E8%A3%82%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%20%E5%85%88%E9%AA%8C%E7%BB%8F%E9%AA%8C%E8%AE%BA%E4%B8%8E%E5%BB%BA%E6%9E%84%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/search"},"page":{"printed_page":208,"pdf_page":239,"physical_index":239,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"ae67b2abf698634bb093086dff3278feba611cda0aac3faeaa9f8b81f22a156a"},"chapter":"第三章 起源与重复","content":"虚拟涉及差异的起源，是一切差异差异化的开始与威力。这是何以在《时间一影像》一书中，当德勒兹在构思影像与思想的关系时，多次指出柏格森著名的蚬壳图示最重要的部分在于“最窄回圈”，这是一切时间一影像与思想一影像的起源，其作为柏格森影像宇宙论的真正“内部界限”1，实际影像直接与其虚拟影像在此交融，一切由此诞生，这是“真正的起源元素”[2]。吾人无疑地可以认为，永恒回归(尼采)与纯粹记忆(柏格森)是德勒兹哲学关于起源的两大启发，二者都涉及其哲学最重要的虚拟问题性，其中之一述说了差异的起源如何已经是重复，而且已经是重复的系列差异最终构成世界本身，另一则以虚拟与实际的交融述说差异如何差异化，并因此构成思想本身。[3]\n\n分裂分析德勒兹\n\n[1] 德勒兹在许多地方提及虚拟与实际的关系，关于“一切客体皆是双重的，它的两个半面却不相似”，主要可参考DR,270-271；德勒兹死后改版的《对话录》(Dialogues,Paris:Flammarion,1996)加入一篇重要的短文，标题即为《实际与虚拟》，译文可参考本书附录。\n\n[2]这并不意味这些概念都是同义的，绝非先验场域就是虚拟就是无器官身体就是内在性平面………相反地，这些概念完全差异，根本不是同一回事，因为它们各自只因自身所特属的问题性而存在，只因自身的问题性而有意义，一旦离开创造它们的独特问题，甚至一旦用字面上的意思来了解这些概念，这些概念就失去它们所有的力量，成为日常的一般性词汇，与德勒兹所思考的问题无关。\n\n208","previous_page":207,"next_page":209}