{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","title":"分裂分析德勒兹 先验经验论与建构主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","id":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","uuid":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","title":"分裂分析德勒兹 先验经验论与建构主义","normalized_title":"分裂分析德勒兹先验经验论与建构主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":327,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%88%86%E8%A3%82%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%20%E5%85%88%E9%AA%8C%E7%BB%8F%E9%AA%8C%E8%AE%BA%E4%B8%8E%E5%BB%BA%E6%9E%84%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/search"},"page":{"printed_page":215,"pdf_page":246,"physical_index":246,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"5ea62448115e477b5cc031345b2fd0615130a2398c51ccf797f3f70111ef2954"},"chapter":"第三章 起源与重复","content":"二、事件必然具有使其由寻常、一般与普同中被分辨出来的特异性，它首先是稀有的，但对德勒兹而言，事件更涉及一种差异与重复的复杂辩证，既是“差异的重复”也是“重复的差异”，而且正是在对事件的这种思考中德勒兹的本体论完成最困难的转换。在《差异与重复》中，这个转换由尼采的永恒回归来说明，每个单一差异都已是重复，每次重复都再度证明差异，本书第三章“起源与重复”对此已作了分析，我们将以事件的角度再提出一种理解。\n\n三、在晚期德勒兹中，特别是《何谓哲学?》与《内在性，单一生命》，事件成为由法文不定冠词un（单一）所强调的特异性。事件具备一种由“世界时刻”1]与“任意空间”[2]所界定的时空条件，仅能由诸事件的“相互表现”所说明。我们将分析德勒兹如何透过对“单一”的重新构思[3]，一方面将特异性与“任意一个”(quelconque)在概念上扣合，另一方面则导向“一切皆特异”的差异哲学结论。\n\n附录\n\n[1]在法文中，personne作为名词主要有个人与人称之意，德勒兹在《差异与重复》中曾对一切的“人类学述词”(prédicats anthropologiques）有极激进的批判(DR,3-4)；相对的，则是“无人称”(impersonnel)，在语言学上是以第三人称单数作为主词的动词状态，如Ⅱpleut(下雨了)，主词Ⅱ只是虚词并不指向任何人。德勒兹在布朗肖的启发下，开展了一系列关于无人称的哲学论述，借以从主体式思想中逃离。\n\n[2] LS, 178.\n\n[3] DR, 148.\n\n[4] Deleuze, Gilles(1995). “L'immanence : Une vie\" , Philosophie, 47, 5.\n\n215","previous_page":214,"next_page":216}