{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","title":"分裂分析德勒兹 先验经验论与建构主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","id":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","uuid":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","title":"分裂分析德勒兹 先验经验论与建构主义","normalized_title":"分裂分析德勒兹先验经验论与建构主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":327,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%88%86%E8%A3%82%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%20%E5%85%88%E9%AA%8C%E7%BB%8F%E9%AA%8C%E8%AE%BA%E4%B8%8E%E5%BB%BA%E6%9E%84%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/search"},"page":{"printed_page":216,"pdf_page":247,"physical_index":247,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"d10895f335dc0ee9c43e61a3f70e8f2bb0e271a7d4a733f27778af94ff774f52"},"chapter":"第三章 起源与重复","content":"透过死亡的无人称性、差异的永恒回归与单一生命，德勒兹提供了一种无人称的“特异性游戏”[4]，构成了20世纪对事件最深刻且原创的哲学之一。\n\n一、事件的谱系学与“反人称政治”\n\n何谓一个事件?或者不如问，何谓一个事件的表现?就某种意义而言，德勒兹在所有著作中似乎不止息地以不同方式提出与答复这个问题。对德勒兹而言，斯多葛学派、莱布尼兹与怀海德分别代表哲学史上三种事件的表现或逻辑，而佩吉(CharlesPéguy)与布朗肖则展现事件的两种相互对应或逆反的原创观点。[5]纵观德勒兹的著作，他先以一本书(《意义的逻辑》)来述说斯多葛学派的事件逻辑，事件在此是诸形体混合时产生的非形体效果。“树是绿的(1’arbre est vert)”将“绿”视为树的固定性质(qualité)\n\n分裂分析德勒兹\n\n[1]\"heure du monde\", MP, 343.\n\n[2]“espace quelconque\", IM, 155.\n\n[3]早期德勒兹激进批判同一性，将重复严格地区别于大写单一，主要可参考DR,164165。然而到了《何谓哲学？》时，早期被严厉批判的“思想影像”在被重新构思成一种正面概念（可参考本书的“思想一影像或思想=影像”一章)，单一一全部(Un-Tout)亦被重新构思，“哲学如同是前哲学或非哲学般，安置大写单一-整体的威力。”(QP,43)\n\n[4]FO, 96.\n\n[5]德勒兹对于“两位最穿透于事件之中的思想者”，佩吉与布朗肖，参阅QP,148。\n\n216","previous_page":215,"next_page":217}