{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","title":"分裂分析德勒兹 先验经验论与建构主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","id":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","uuid":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","title":"分裂分析德勒兹 先验经验论与建构主义","normalized_title":"分裂分析德勒兹先验经验论与建构主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":327,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%88%86%E8%A3%82%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%20%E5%85%88%E9%AA%8C%E7%BB%8F%E9%AA%8C%E8%AE%BA%E4%B8%8E%E5%BB%BA%E6%9E%84%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/search"},"page":{"printed_page":241,"pdf_page":272,"physical_index":272,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"9f0995965b4dbc1e4778987af492978295e69733c85e5481f38e154674ab9440"},"chapter":"第三章 起源与重复","content":"在德勒兹著作中有一条原则似乎从不曾改变：思考不来自(柏拉图所谓的)良善意志，不来自智性的逻辑操作，也不来自一切既成想法与共感的加总繁衍。真正的思考需要“绝对必然的一爪，亦即对思想的原初暴力、怪异或敌意，唯有如此才能由自然的惊愕或永恒的可能性中提取思想。由是，只存在被迫激起于思想中的非意志思想，尤其愈以随机的破坏方式诞生于世界就愈绝对必然。名列思想之首的，是破坏、暴力，是敌对，这里没有所谓的爱智之学，一切始于恨智之学。绝勿信赖思想是为了建立它所想的相对必然性，相反的，要信赖与迫使思考之物相遇的偶然性，以便竖起与奠立思考行动或思考热情的绝对必然性。真正的批判与真正的创造有相同的条件：摧毁自我预设的思想影像，创生思想行动于思想本身之中”。[2]如果再现体制以各种形式统治着思想，全新思想的诞生就只能是(相对于既有想法的）暴力、非逻辑、非意志、无意识与不可思考。这是在鼓吹一种新的反智论吗？答案当然是否定的。德勒兹的“迫使思考之物”与柏拉图的“思想的邀请”指向同一种心灵状态：矛盾而冲突的感觉。差别在于柏拉图随即奔赴他念兹在兹的永恒观念，德勒兹则从不愿丝毫离开这股原初的力量，而不受任何条件限定且脱离一切既定观念的拟像，正是对思考的暴力邀请，一个绝佳的迫使思考之物。\n\n附录\n\n[1]柏拉图，《共和国》，§524。\n\n[2]DR,181-182。德勒兹在此将miso（恨）-sophie（智慧）对立于哲学philo（爱）-sophie(智慧)。\n\n241","previous_page":240,"next_page":242}