{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","title":"分裂分析德勒兹 先验经验论与建构主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","id":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","uuid":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","title":"分裂分析德勒兹 先验经验论与建构主义","normalized_title":"分裂分析德勒兹先验经验论与建构主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":327,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%88%86%E8%A3%82%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%20%E5%85%88%E9%AA%8C%E7%BB%8F%E9%AA%8C%E8%AE%BA%E4%B8%8E%E5%BB%BA%E6%9E%84%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/search"},"page":{"printed_page":244,"pdf_page":275,"physical_index":275,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"56f0cfaee5080ed07c697f1d4272d804745e6a91789580edcecb71da418c7a3c"},"chapter":"第三章 起源与重复","content":"三、阅读柏格森\n\n德勒兹以令人诧异的方式一读再读柏格森。早在1956年便以两篇论文综论柏格森思想，并特别聚焦于差异问题1],1966年的《柏格森主义》则从柏格森的时间性涉入差异与虚拟两大论题之中，1968年的《差异与重复》以柏格森的纯粹过去作为时间第二综合的主要论据，15年后出版的《运动—影像》与《时间—影像》更是将柏格森解读成电影评论最重要的参照之一。[2]\n\n已成为解读柏格森哲学经典的这些阅读中，德勒兹其实集中心力于阐释柏格森1896年出版的《物质与记忆》。尤其是《运动—影像》与《时间—影像》几乎是对此书的逐章注解。不过，如果我们知道《物质与记忆》的核心概念是物质化的影像时，似乎也就不难了解这本书何以在德勒兹眼中有举足轻重的地位了。事实上，《物质与记忆》虽然集中谈论影像，但并不表示柏格森的影像概念因此清楚可解，问题的症结或许不在柏格森，而在于他创造的概念已超出再现式影像的范畴进入全新领域，这是哲学史上再次有人挑战观念论对影像的既成想法。\n\n分裂分析德勒兹\n\n[1] 《柏格森1859—1941》与《柏格森思想的差异构思》是德勒兹早期最让人惊艳的论文，这也见证了柏格森与德勒兹思想的亲缘性，特别是在差异问题的思考上。这两篇论文前者收录于梅洛-庞蒂编的《著名哲学家》(Les philosophes célebres)中，后者则发表于《柏格森研究》。\n\n[2] 柏格森认为电影源自人类知性的重大缺陷，甚至视其为虚假运动的代表而痛加挞伐，主要见《创造进化论》(L'évolution créatrice）第四章。德勒兹却不无幽默地指出：柏格森正是在不谈电影处谈出了电影的真理。\n\n244","previous_page":243,"next_page":245}