{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","title":"分裂分析德勒兹 先验经验论与建构主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","id":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","uuid":"4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","title":"分裂分析德勒兹 先验经验论与建构主义","normalized_title":"分裂分析德勒兹先验经验论与建构主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":327,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%88%86%E8%A3%82%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%20%E5%85%88%E9%AA%8C%E7%BB%8F%E9%AA%8C%E8%AE%BA%E4%B8%8E%E5%BB%BA%E6%9E%84%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4bd1f0d7-8363-46b4-a5b5-0c3ef555a01d/search"},"page":{"printed_page":94,"pdf_page":125,"physical_index":125,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"b628e9e20d67176cac6c5dca7ea2814f8b21e2bd19f60ac30638daa373b936c8"},"chapter":"第一章 时间","content":"思想运动的非意志悬宕、“思想一大写存在”的彰显与朝向未来的思想一影像，这便是德勒兹自动机制的三位一体。在此，一切都由偶然与掷骰子决定，一切能力都被推往其极限，域外涌现，而域内自我折曲；暴力与残酷的能量盈溢于先验场域，一切都还是前个体化、非人称、非历时、拓扑、无意识与虚拟的，这便是无器官身体，也是思想真正诞生之地。对德勒兹而言，最终的思想一影像只能如此，而且如同尼采的超人，一切过度描述都将使之沦为夸大的漫画。然而，如果一切都逼近混沌与偶然，我们如何重绘属于德勒兹本身的这幅思想一影像呢？如果影像的生机论源于一种特属于德勒兹所建构的虚拟性，如何才能呈现他的思想一影像而不败坏其虚拟性？我们的赌注或许在于保留思想虚拟性，而较不在于述说与定义何谓虚拟，在于由现实中再活化虚拟，而较不在于将其固着、成为新的教条。对于虚拟的论述无疑地本身也必须具有虚拟性，德勒兹似乎已对这种虚拟论述提供他自己的暗示：“这个崭新的精神自动机制与崭新的心理自动机制仰仗一种美学………”[1当一切存在都是影像时，思想也必然是一种影像：思想一影像。而正是在此，在一种世界与大脑、域外与域内的拓扑翻转，也在实际与虚拟的交互作用下，一种特属于思想一影像的美学被建构出来。思想与美学在德勒兹处取得一种本体论意义，这便是朗西埃(Jacques Rancière)何以会指出德勒兹哲学最终证明了一种至为独特的“思想美学”[2]，而其论述基底则建构在特属于德勒兹的思想一影像或思想=影像之无穷辩证中。\n\n分裂分析德勒兹\n\n[1] IT,218.\n\n94","previous_page":93,"next_page":95}