{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","uuid":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","normalized_title":"马克思的价值当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","isbns":["9787520180269"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":244,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%EF%BC%9A%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%AD%A6%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/search"},"page":{"printed_page":108,"pdf_page":115,"physical_index":115,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"4ca6295e9548d267a4bc4fe951a1181be2ce2e5720f249521c34064f9f106d9c"},"chapter":"第五章 价值、价格和剥削","content":"一般地说，在中立、科学和高效外衣的掩盖下，机器在劳动过程的节奏和内容上独断专行。从历史上看，机械化引发或解决了就酬劳和工作条件展开的数不清的争论。②\n\n技术不仅仅控制自然，它还控制人。劳动分工和工厂体系为控制劳动的速度和质量提供了方法，就如同现代的流水线方法。技术为工作场所提供社会控制和行为准则。因此，科技发展在社会上并非中立的；它会反映阶级利益和社会政治压力。③\n\n马克思的价值：当代资本主义政治经济学批判\n\n①参见Postone(1993，p. 332)；还可以参见 pp.47-48。广义上看，资本以三种方式控制着工人：其一，资本拥有生产资料，而工人必须寻找有酬雇佣以求得生存；其二，已经购买了工人的劳动力以后，资本声称对整个劳动过程拥有控制权；其三，生产资料的拥有权和对生产过程的控制，使得资本极大地影响着国家、经济政策、法律体系和其他社会制度。这些主导方式是无可辩驳的，例如，工人为有酬劳动和在工作场所的从属地位展开了不懈斗争，寻求更高的工资和更好的工作条件，而且为了维护自己在生产线以及其他地方的利益而投身集体活动。还可以参见Bahr(1980，p. 102)，Brighton Labour Process Group(1977) 和Marglin(1974)。\n\n②“资本对自动化的优先性就是在攻击生产循环中的这些阶段——工人坚守自身工作节奏的阶段，就是在攻击劳动中的这些地方—工作场所，喷漆、装饰和组装车间，或储藏室。这种选择性定义着集体劳动在重构中对工人阶级提出的威胁。”(Levidow and Young 1981，p. 2)还可以参见 Capital 1(pp. 486，508)。③ 参见Nell（1992，p.54)。换句话说，“取得更高水平技术进步的工业化过程，与资本主义权威的持续增长，是同一个过程。工业化作为生产手段，作为工人的对立面，它迅速壮大，资本对它的绝对控制也有必要随之而增长”(Panzieri1980，p. 48)。还可以参见 Capital 1(pp. 526-527，553-554)和 Uno(1980，pp.30-31)。\n\n108","previous_page":107,"next_page":109}