{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","uuid":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","normalized_title":"马克思的价值当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","isbns":["9787520180269"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":244,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%EF%BC%9A%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%AD%A6%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/search"},"page":{"printed_page":143,"pdf_page":150,"physical_index":150,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"0be17108e2947f7bbfc18a62e587bda362f42c94dcd27b4881a0eb7fa8cf9551"},"chapter":"第七章 价值转化为生产价格","content":"第七章 价值转化为生产价格\n\n不同部门的竞争引人了《资本论》中分析层次的一次重要转变。这一类竞争连同资本迁移的可能性，共同解释了经济中资本和劳动的分配，解释了由价值到价格的转变，后者变成了生产价格。价值向生产价格的转化（参见第五章第四节），是依据每个资本的大小——不论其最初大小如何——进行的剩余价值的再分配。\n\n这种转化对马克思的著作很重要，而马克思又给出了看似反直觉的转化方式，这使转化问题得到广泛的关注。①经常有人主张转化揭示了马克思方法的根本缺陷，并证明了以马克思价值理论为基础的分析在劫难逃。②这些主张受到了来自众多文献的广泛的（不囿于马克思主义的）批评。这些文献主张：很容易就可以（用不同方式）矫正马克思转化程序中的问题，抑或马克思的方法是一致的，需要恰当地理解而非修正马克思的方法。③本章以这种观点为基础，但从不同角度切入。前面的分析通常主张转化源于预付资本的价值构成的不同。与之相比，众所周知的是，马克思把转化归结于资本的有机构成的不同。第六章对这些概念做了比较和对比，本章将勾勒出它们在转化上的意义。①\n\n① 与转化问题有关的文献数量极多，在这里既无必要也无时间一一审视。可以参见Desai(1989, 1992), Dostaler and Lagueux (1985), Elson (1979a), FineandHarris (1979, ch.2), Freeman and Carchedi (1996), Howard and King(1991, chs. 12 - 14), Laibman (1973), Mandel and Freeman (1984), Mohun(1995),Schwartz(1977),Steedman(1981) 和 Sweezy(1949)。\n\n② 例如，请参见 Böhm - Bawerk (1949),Samuelson(1957,1971) 和 Steedman(1977)。\n\n③参见第二章以及Arthur andReuten(1998)，Baumol(1974，1992)，Duménil(1980)，Fine(1986a)，Foley(1982,1986)，Kliman and McGlone(转下 页注)\n\n143","previous_page":142,"next_page":144}