{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","uuid":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","normalized_title":"马克思的价值当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","isbns":["9787520180269"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":244,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%EF%BC%9A%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%AD%A6%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/search"},"page":{"printed_page":154,"pdf_page":161,"physical_index":161,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"7b7ce327cf1b61c1c62fd68bf547fb618deebc74082b4d9546bb8a2faf9aedf5"},"chapter":"第七章 价值转化为生产价格","content":"抽出生产资料的价值，这就把剩余价值的分配以及随之而来的生产价格的确定向公众公开，而不用考虑随转化而来的交换率的系统改变。再者，它抓住了货币商品的价值转化的影响，这种影响本来会使价值和价格的关系更加复杂，会使引入的概念模糊不清，尤其是货币生产部门的资本价值构成不同于社会平均水平的时候。①总而言之，不能从马克思的转化程序计算价格矢量，理由有三个：（1）马克思处理的是每100镑预付资本生产的商品的生产价格，而不是它们的单位价格；(2）他抽出可投入价值的转化；并且（3）抽出来货币-商品价值的转化。②\n\n马克思的价值：当代资本主义政治经济学批判\n\n① 参见 Capital 3 (p. 142), Foley (1983, p. 9),Mattick Jr. (1991 -92, pp. 51-52)和Uno(1980，p.95n.5)。依据传统思路，货币的价值取决于货币商品(金）的生产条件。这些条件与经济均值的差别，创造了货币单位的“内在”价值与其在交换中的表现之间的差异，这使总和的相等变得模糊起来。金生产使用的固定资本，使数学很难处理价格的决定方式。\n\n② 对马克思方法的这些特征认识不足，部分原因在于Bortkiewicz(1949，1952)倡导的程序。例如，Desai（1992，p.17）抱怨马克思“忘了提及（转下页注）\n\n154","previous_page":153,"next_page":155}