{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","uuid":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","normalized_title":"马克思的价值当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","isbns":["9787520180269"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":244,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%EF%BC%9A%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%AD%A6%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/search"},"page":{"printed_page":159,"pdf_page":166,"physical_index":166,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"9140d0e649b939c5dfe95d8dc161710b47721079eaa2548eb17600bd20daec3d"},"chapter":"第七章 价值转化为生产价格","content":"为了把这两个阶段区分开，资本有机构成的使用非常关键，因为它有助于确定转化的原因，并且有助于解释价格和价值的关系。尤为重要的是，它证明了马克思的兴趣在于劳动、价格和利润的概念关系，而不在于对价格或利润率的代数计算。最后，它表明在这种情况下所预设的均衡是站不住脚的。对转化的这种解读表明《资本论》第三卷表达的东西与马克思的方法相一致，这是他重构资本主义经济的主要范畴的一部分。\n\n大多数文献通过资本价值构成来研究转化问题，这本身并不是错误的，而且有可能引出重要的理论进展，然而，这种思路并没有继承马克思的问题。这种方式所能引出的各种解决方案，可以通过它们思考问题的结构、前面的诸多程序和所受到的对待而相互区分开来。在文献中找到的诸多转化程序是马克思的程序的代替品。不能说那些程序“修正”了马克思的程序，因为它们表述的是不同的问题，而且它们的价格-价值关系的概念与马克思的概念也不一样。对马克思的转化理解不到位，就会抱怨马克思忘了生产技术的特殊性，抑或马克思没转化所投入的价值。①本章已然证明这些反对是不合时宜的，因为它们强调的问题并非马克思在转化中关注的主要对象，它们会模糊（而非揭示）马克思所研究的主题。\n\n第七章 价值转化为生产价格\n\n① 参见 Bortkiewicz (1949, p. 201； 1952, p. 9),Desai (1989)，Dobb(1967, pp. 532 -533), Duménil(1980, pp.8, 22 - 23, 51), Lipietz (1982, p. 64), Meek (1956, p. 98; 1973, pp. xxi, 191), Sweezy (1949, p. xxiv; 1968, p. 115), de Vroey (1982, p. 47) 和 Winternitz (1948, p. 278)。\n\n159","previous_page":158,"next_page":160}