{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","uuid":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","normalized_title":"马克思的价值当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","isbns":["9787520180269"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":244,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%EF%BC%9A%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%AD%A6%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/search"},"page":{"printed_page":162,"pdf_page":169,"physical_index":169,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"2cc2105f212838e3230ec0d5be1522a3be9fc6144dd7211da76c6a4eb3930b06"},"chapter":"第八章 货币、信用和通货膨胀","content":"马克思对价值形式的分析以货币形式告终，它证明了货币有其本质：它垄断着交换的可能性，它成为一般等价物。简言之，货币能够交换任何商品，而商品一般而言不能相互交换。除此之外，马克思的分析意味着货币的功能来自货币的本质，而非新古典主义和后凯恩斯主义理论所说货币的本质来自货币的功能。\n\n马克思处理货币的方式意味着“货币能做什么来自货币是什么”：由于货币垄断着交换的可能性，它还能衡量价值、促进交换、偿还债务等。由此来看，货币就其功能而言具有秩序性和内在的一致性，它绝非随机的。②\n\n货币的社会和历史决定性（包括其本质和功能）意味着货币是一种社会关系，它来自商品生产者之间的表达方式。商品交换唯有在资本主义条件下才得到充分发展，因为资本主义条件下交换已经变得大化流行，而货币的礼仪性使用已经微不足道了。\n\n马克思区分了作为货币的货币和作为资本的货币。③作为货币的货币是价值尺度和流通手段，它执行三个功能：支付手段、贮藏手段和国际货币。作为资本的货币是为生产或剩余价值的交换而预付的货币。作为资本的货币与作为货币的货币密切相关，因为货币的形式和功能是一样的，货币有可能同时执行两种功能。例如支付工资时，对工人而言的C—M—C'和对资本家而言的M—C一M'，二者是同一个东西。现在让我们简要地看一看货币的功能和形式。\n\n马克思的价值：当代资本主义政治经济学批判\n\n(接上页注①)参见 Fine(1989，pp. 70- 71)，Gleicher(1983，p. 100)，Ilyenkov (1982, pp. 189 - 196,260 - 279), Messori(1984), Mollo (1999), Reuten and Williams (1989, pp. 65, 84 - 89), Rosdolsky (1977, part Ⅱ), Rosenthal (1997, chs. 11, 15),Saad - Filho(1993a) 和 Weeks(1981, ch.4)。\n\n① 参见 Capital 1 (p. 182)。\n\n②参见 Fine and Lapavitsas(2000,p. 370)。\n\n③ 参见 Capital 1(pp. 247 - 257), Capital 2(pp. 163 - 164),Capital 3(pp. 576 - 577, 592), Theories of Surplus Value 3 (pp. 475, 490), Contribution (pp. 304 - 309), Bologna (1993c, pp. 8 - 9), Fine (1985 - 86, p. 388, 1989, pp. 79 - 80) 和 Likitkijsomboon(1995，p. 101)。\n\n162","previous_page":161,"next_page":163}