{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","uuid":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","normalized_title":"马克思的价值当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","isbns":["9787520180269"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":244,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%EF%BC%9A%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%AD%A6%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/search"},"page":{"printed_page":177,"pdf_page":184,"physical_index":184,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"d6675fcdc796ce42c531e73ec04e70c6e440430307554bab4a27aab2aab41929"},"chapter":"第八章 货币、信用和通货膨胀","content":"虽然有这些重要的限制因素，冲突的方式仍具有现在的关联性。分配的冲突必定是任何通货膨胀理论的一部分，因为缺少了对国民收入水平和国民收入分配的不满意，通货膨胀不可能持续存在。\n\n(二)垄断资本、消费不足和通货膨胀\n\n许多马克思主义者论证，通货膨胀与大公司日益增长的市场力量相关、与消费不足相关，垄断资本学派的主张最为清晰。②这种方法论证垄断资本是最有活力的公司，是最大的投资者、雇主、生产者和出口商。为了让经济增长最大化，政府通过购买、廉价基础设施、减税、科研和发展补助等方式，支持垄断。更广泛地说，政府在公务人员薪资、消费和公共投资、健康基金、教育和国防上花费巨资，这些钱很大一部分转化成与社会安全相关的费用。通过直接购买和间接转化到消费者上，这些花费支撑着垄断。尤其在20世纪40年代晚期到60年代晚期，政府颁布的干涉主义的福利政策造就了经济空前的稳定性、高就业率和高增速。然而，它们也带来了持续的预算赤字、公共债务的增长和通货膨胀的悄然发生。总而言之，通货膨胀是干涉主义经济政策的结果，这种政策试图在受垄断力量和价格测量制约的经济中，确保充分的就业和社会的稳定性。①\n\n第八章货币、信用和通货膨胀\n\n① 参见 Fine and Leopold(1993)。\n\n② 最经典的例子是 Baran and Sweezy(1966)；还可以参见 Best(1972)，Bryan (1985), Dollars and Sense (1978), Dowd ( 1976), Gamble and Walton (1976), Morris (1972), Sherman (1972, 1976a, b), Spero (1969), Sweezy andMagdoff(1979, 1983, drawing on Steindl 1952), Szymanski (1984) 和 Zarifian(1975)。相关批评请参见 Aglietta(1979，pp. 26-28)，Semmler（1982)， Weeks(1982b)和 Wright(1977)。Clarke（1988)剖析了“凯恩斯式政府”， 而Bleaney(1976)批判性审视了消费不足理论。\n\n177","previous_page":176,"next_page":178}