{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","uuid":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","normalized_title":"马克思的价值当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","isbns":["9787520180269"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":244,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%EF%BC%9A%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%AD%A6%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/search"},"page":{"printed_page":22,"pdf_page":29,"physical_index":29,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"1ac250b608d9247aab526e7016caa9f5fca0559bd6651d907fac0f8399899392"},"chapter":"第一章 唯物辩证法","content":"(三) 资本\n\n马克思表达了由简单商品流通（C—M—C'，商品—货币—另一种商品）到资本循环（M—C—M'，货币—商品—更多货币）的过渡，而这常常被当作纯粹的逻辑环节。例如，穆雷（PatrickMurray）主张：\n\n在简单商品流通中……货币想要保持自身为货币，除了跳出流通外别无他途……如果不能通过跳出流通而保持自身，那么货币必定只能在流通中保持自身。由货币到资本的过渡起到的作用就在于此……储存起来以避免流通中的危险，货币总是以确定的、有限的数量存在，这一事实与它的逻辑结果—它是普遍财富的化身——相矛盾……另外，通过把自身当作稳定物价的过程，资本解决了货币停滞的矛盾，例如，通过在流通中增加数量，货币打破了对自身数量的限制。②\n\n在黑格尔辩证法的启发下，穆雷的观点受到误导，误入歧途，因而是错误的(参见本章第二节)。首先，它是被误导的。因为它预设了货币和资本这两个概念是自动的主体，出于纯粹的逻辑命令，使自身在某种程度上成为现实。其次，它是误入歧途的。穆雷忽视了商品、货币和资本存在于其中的社会、经济和历史背景，这遮蔽并贬低了人的作用。最后，它是错误的。因为穆雷把一个事实（货币在数量上是一般的）与一个假设（数量上货币应当变得不受限制）混淆在了一起。①\n\n6\n\n马克思的价值：当代资本主义政治经济学批判\n\n① 类似的论证参见 Perelman(1987，pp. 198-201)，Rubin(1975，pp. 109-110;1978,pp. 130 -131)和 M. Smith(1994a,p. 74)。T. Smith(1998,p. 468)的论证是正确的：“当我们大步走向更为复杂的资本分类时，我们走向对价值的更复杂的解释、把价值当作具体的普遍，甚至让社会生活的更多维度都服从它……对于马克思……仅仅表明了价值是黑格尔意义上的具体的普遍还不够。他想要解释这种异化力量如何能够主宰社会生活。抽象劳动在这种解释中起了关键作用。”\n\n② 参见 Murray(1998，pp.177-179)。\n\n22","previous_page":21,"next_page":23}