{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","uuid":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","normalized_title":"马克思的价值当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","isbns":["9787520180269"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":244,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%EF%BC%9A%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%AD%A6%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/search"},"page":{"printed_page":29,"pdf_page":36,"physical_index":36,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"5c14de073f7ed5bbc0753483a69655bc1ae27f87b53c75e8a194cb2b31b11c5e"},"chapter":"第一章 唯物辩证法","content":"畴的体系。\n\n通常来讲，陈述是一种逐渐的超越，由运动中抽象的决定到具体的决定，即具体化。通过超越先前抽象决定中的矛盾，通过提供先前抽象决定中更具体的基础，陈述不断前进。①\n\n重复这个程序，就让我们在智力中重构具体。\n\n有鉴于已经发展了的整个范畴系统，需要被表述的存在的所有条件都已经被理解了；唯有此时，陈述才算结束。各种形式在自身内就包含这些条件，并且通过自身的有效性而创造这些条件……建立在这种基础上的整体性就是自足。②\n\n“新辩证法”并不认可这一点——研究具体的历史发展有助于在思想中重构具体（在这种重构中陈述方式和具体的历史发展之间的不同是不相关的)。③因此，《资本论》评述资本主义历史的这些部分，仅仅被算作说明性的材料。尽管这些部分可能有助于证明对范畴的分析，但是，它们在《资本论》中没起到实质性作用。\n\n第一章 唯物辩证法\n\n① 参见 Reuten and Williams(1989，p. 22)，还可以参见 Arthur(1993a，p. 67)，Campbell (1993) 和 T. Smith(1990, p. 13; 1997, p. 191)。T. Smith(1998,pp.464-465）试图使用八个层次的抽象及其混杂结果重构《资本论》。\n\n② 参见 Arthur(1993a，p. 67)，还可 以参见 Reuten and Williams(1989，pp. 5-23)。\n\n③对 Reuten and Williams(1989，p. 34）来说，“历史在解释存在为何产生的时候很重要，但是，它不能解释存在物为何是‘如此这般的样子’，不能解释存在物作为有内在联系的整体是如何再生产自身的”。还可以参见Arthur（1992，p. iii),Murray (1988, p. 182) 和 T. Smith(1993a, p. 102)。\n\n29","previous_page":28,"next_page":30}