{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","uuid":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","normalized_title":"马克思的价值当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","isbns":["9787520180269"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":244,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%EF%BC%9A%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%AD%A6%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/search"},"page":{"printed_page":32,"pdf_page":39,"physical_index":39,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"ed44bcc41dad472110d8b0f9cf7a22298e9b7b57c2910950edb71fe3dc42e47e"},"chapter":"第一章 唯物辩证法","content":"(四) 唯心主义\n\n“新辩证法”是唯心主义的，因为它主要关注具体决定因素中的逻辑结构而不是物质结构。分析地看，这种黑格尔主义的方法不健康而且具有潜在的误导性，因为它“使逻辑具体化或使经验逻辑化（这二者是一回事)”。②\n\n这已经成为一种时尚：“重构”《资本论》时，试图把它当作一个与“辩证的三段论”相纠缠的完整系列，仿佛若不诉诸某种“逻辑”，所谈论的《资本论》中的证据就是不完整、不自足的(而这种“逻辑”在那种谈论中恰恰是找不到的)；仿佛马克思的分析被迫服从一个由“逻辑”要求决定的概念序列，而不是适合做出分析的概念序列决定于这个要求——把握其特殊的主观材料。这种做法的不明智之处恰恰在于那种呆板的要求——预先给定物质材料，这一点使马克思从一开始就明确反对黑格尔式哲学。③\n\n8\n\n马克思的价值：当代资本主义政治经济学批判\n\n① 批判T.Smith（1999b，p.166）的主张（“系统的辩证法历史的理论化之间存在着不可逾越的鸿沟”)时，Fine，Lapavitsas and Milonakis(2000，p. 136)的论证是正确的：“新辩证法”忽略了历史，这“赋予理论家在解释具体历史现象时以无限自由。果真如此的话，做出的任何解释都能与（指向这同一个现象的）任何一般理论相符合……我们相信这种企图在逻辑和历史之间钉一个楔子—是一种深层的误导。相反，逻辑应当利用历史的具体形式，正是在这种具体形式中，资本的积累得以实现”。\n\n②参见Rosenthal(1997，p. 113)。\n\n③ 参见 Rosenthal(1997，p. 141)，还可以参见pp. 151-152。Mattick Jr.(1993)，Psy-chopedis(1992)和 T.Smith(1990a)温和地回应了Rosenthal。\n\n32","previous_page":31,"next_page":33}