{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","uuid":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","normalized_title":"马克思的价值当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","isbns":["9787520180269"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":244,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%EF%BC%9A%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%AD%A6%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/search"},"page":{"printed_page":35,"pdf_page":42,"physical_index":42,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"ede75d5c6f5bfe16f7ab17631436e470022148d237a0369d6c562e580c511b6d"},"chapter":"第一章 唯物辩证法","content":"纯粹的概念推理有局限性，因为它无法解释为什么分析者头脑中有效的那些关系，在现实世界中必定同样有效。更宽泛地说，“新辩证法”是不自足的而且潜在地具有误导性，因为即便具体以历史性为基础并且具有偶然性，“新辩证法”也渴望通过单纯的概念来重构现实。唯有历史性分析也属于一种论述方法，才能够对具体加以分析。避开了这种联系，“新辩证法”就不能解释具体，正如它不能证明概念的必然性。②换言之，“新辩证法”最大的缺点就在于未认识到这一点：要求复杂概念从简单概念的矛盾中来，这并非马克思方法论的唯一特征，亦非最重要的特征。相反，最重要的东西莫过于新概念和新材料为何、如何以及何时被吸收到分析中，以使它变得更丰富、更稳定、更能够重构具体。\n\n尽管“新辩证法”对理解马克思的方法及著作内容有很大帮助，但这仍不足以把握具体的价值或《资本论》的价值。\n\n第三节 结论\n\n本章用唯物辩证法的原则解释了《资本论》和其他著作中马克思的方法。这种方法用辩证法确定具体的本质特征及其真正的矛盾，以便解释历史变化中的实在和潜能。对唯物辩证法而言，认识到这个事实——历史和逻辑是不可分割的——并非对经验主义的让步，它是这一事实——不可能把现实简单归纳为概念—的必然结果。本章把这种观点与另一种黑格尔式的观点（所谓“新辩证法”）进行比较，“新辩证法”把马克思的方法理解为随着思维的辩证过程而展开的机械论方法，其进展在很大程度上不依赖决定了具体的现实结构。\n\n第一章 唯物辩证法\n\n① 参见 Marx(1989，pp.544-545)，还可以参见p. 547。\n\n②“黑格尔倾向范畴由于自身的不稳定性而产生和衰亡；只要它们仍旧是思想，那就是某种主观心灵’。他的逻辑的这种客观主义倾向得到进一步强化，因为其真理既是本体论的又是逻辑的。逻辑的连贯性同时也是现实的连贯性。”(Arthur 1993a，pp. 67- 68) 还可以参见 Albritton(1999，p.57)，Colletti(1972)，Fracchia and Ryan (1992, p. 59) 和 Lenin (1972, pp. 88 -97, 146 – 147, 167 - 171,177-180,187,190)。\n\n35","previous_page":34,"next_page":36}