{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","uuid":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","normalized_title":"马克思的价值当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","isbns":["9787520180269"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":244,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%EF%BC%9A%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%AD%A6%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/search"},"page":{"printed_page":42,"pdf_page":49,"physical_index":49,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"97cf3ce2bbb1a09804af97d05b9cace6bdace7c729231e5a9d3e34a941703eca"},"chapter":"第二章 理解马克思的价值理论","content":"上述错误想法推动了传统马克思主义转化为“李嘉图式的马克思主义”。然而，这种立场是站不住脚的（参见第八章第一节)。②马克思很难把自己的观点与李嘉图的观点区分开来，而且在他的大部分著作中，马克思严厉谴责李嘉图在方法论及其他方面的错误。尤其是马克思还论证：李嘉图的方式并不充分，因为它不能解释货币和商品的关系、抽象劳动和价值的关系，以及劳动方式和资本主义条件下的剥削关系。③\n\n马克思的价值：当代资本主义政治经济学批判\n\n(接上页注③)104-105)还可以参见pp. xxiv，152，180-181，241-242，303-305。这种观点利用了恩格斯（Engels1981）的看法。相关的批评，参见Catephores(1986) 和 Fine(1986b)；还可以参见 Brenner(1986) 和 Milonakis(1990)。\n\n① 参见 Albritton(1986，pp. 18 -19) 和 Reinfelder(1980，p. 13)。\n\n②对马克思的“李嘉图式”理解受到了下列学者们的激烈批判：Faccarello(1986), Ganssmann(1986), Gerstein(1986), Shaikh(1977, 1981, 1982),Freeman and Carchedi(1996), 以及 Mandel and Freeman(1984)。\n\n③“把马克思的价值理论当作剥削的证据，是对价值的去历史化，是使价值成为劳动时间的同义词，是使马克思的区分—区分剩余劳动和剩余价值—成为画蛇添足。想要知道剥削是否存在，我们必须审视所有权和对生产方式的控制，必须审视逐步确定工作日长度的过程……马克思关心资本主义下剥削所采取的具体方式……因为在资本主义下，剩余劳动不可能以直接劳动产品的形式被占有。那种劳动产品必须被出售而且转化成货币。”(参见Elson1979b，p. 116) 还可 以参见 Fine(1982)，Postone(1993，p. 54) 和 Rubin(1979，part 4)。\n\n42","previous_page":41,"next_page":43}