{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","uuid":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","normalized_title":"马克思的价值当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","isbns":["9787520180269"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":244,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%EF%BC%9A%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%AD%A6%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/search"},"page":{"printed_page":50,"pdf_page":57,"physical_index":57,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"e0f97fe48fe814f320a17f4f6b1753a1b692fec0d93ba9b0f352fa9529dfb6c6"},"chapter":"第二章 理解马克思的价值理论","content":"鲁宾传统至少以两种重要方式对马克思价值分析的发展有贡献。第一，抽象劳动是由出售而间接形成的社会劳动，这种主张只适用于商品经济，它为强力批判非历史的物化劳动观点提供了动力(参见本章第一节)。这种批判使马克思主义研究的聚焦点由价值和价格的计算，转向对生产及其表现形式的社会关系的分析。\n\n第二，这种传统强调货币对价值分析的重要性，因为价值通过且只能通过价格才得以显现。既然货币在商品经济中起着关键作用，那么，对马克思理论的非货币性均衡的理解从根本上就是错误的，不用任何中介来表达抽象劳动注定是徒劳无功的，计算物化劳动系数的做法也不会有意义（参见第五章第四节）。①对货币重要性的强调，促进了对马克思主义货币分析之兴趣的复兴(参见第八章)；对物化劳动观点的批判，为对马克思的更有说服力的理解开辟了新道路。\n\n8\n\n马克思的价值：当代资本主义政治经济学批判\n\n① 参见 Rubin(1975，pp.96-97，142；1978，pp.118 -119)。还可以参见 Rubin(1975, pp.66 -71,97 -99, 120, 127 - 130, 141- 146, 150; 1978, pp.124 -125)。对于de Vroey(1981，p.176)，“劳动最初表现为私人劳动，由私人的独立决定而来。当且仅当产品被出售时，它才转变成社会劳动。当社会劳动产生于这种背景时，它被称作抽象劳动，抽象’这个形容词指的是通过市场上的交换而实现的同质化”。因此，“价值不是单纯的劳动的化身或一个技术过程，它指的是通过商品交换而来的私人劳动的有效性……只有当私人劳动产品被出售，私人劳动才生效（被当作社会劳动的一部分、有效地服务于私人劳动的再生产)。否则，私人劳动只不过是废物”(deVroey 1982，p. 40)。还可以参见El-dred and Hanlon(1981, pp. 26, 35),Himmelweit and Mohun (1978, pp. 73 - 74;1981, pp. 232 -234), Mattick Jr. (1991-92, pp. 33 -35), Mohun (1991), Re-uten (1995), Reuten and Williams (1989, pp. 66 - 70), T. Smith (1990, p. 72;1993b,p. 21)和 de Vroey(1981,pp. 176, 184;1982, p. 46;1985, p. 47)。\n\n50","previous_page":49,"next_page":51}