{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","uuid":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","normalized_title":"马克思的价值当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","isbns":["9787520180269"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":244,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%EF%BC%9A%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%AD%A6%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/search"},"page":{"printed_page":57,"pdf_page":64,"physical_index":64,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"e8c42d7241682492426c0389a307cdeecf109138510d1c989eab5ad5fd83f951"},"chapter":"第二章 理解马克思的价值理论","content":"$$\nS = 1 - V = 1 - \\frac { w l x } { p y } = \\Pi\n$$\n\nⅡ是总利润，在这种情况下，从定义看，马克思把总剩余价值等同于总利润仍是成立的。①最后，剩余价值率是：\n\n$$\ne = { \\frac { S } { V } } = { \\frac { \\Pi } { W } }\n$$\n\n为商品定价并且已支付工资后，剩余价值率就被确定了。工资收入如何使用（是用于生活必需品或奢侈品，还是用于储蓄或储藏)，并不影响剩余价值率。对“新解释”来说，这种关系说明了利润只不过是剩余价值的再分配（参见第四章第二节）。\n\n让我们更加仔细地考察“新解释”的贡献，就从净产量开始吧。有两种方式可以把经济的净产量概念化。第一，利用与使用价值有关的术语将其概念化，例如，消费方式和净投资方式，或总产量中维持生产系统的必需品（重复同样方式和水平的生产)之外的那部分；第二，利用与价值有关的术语将其概念化，它等同于新表现出来的劳动。这提出了一个问题总产量的价值：劳动创造了全部的净产量，但只创造了总产量价值中的一部分。\n\n“新解释”意味着传统的定义（马克思总产量中的平等）前后矛盾，因为生产资料的价值在总产品的价值中计算了两次。它先被当作新生产出来的生产资料的价值，后被当作所使用的生产方式的新价值（参见第五章第二节）。然而，无论现在还是之前的某个阶段，后者并不等同于实际表现出来的劳动；它只不过是所使用的劳动的反映，是其他地方创造的价值。②这些洞见很有说服力。然而，出于两个理由，关注净产量有可能误导人。第一，从\n\n第二章 理解马克思的价值理论\n\n①参见Duménil(1980，p. 82)。\n\n②参见Duménil(1980,pp.62-63；1983-84,pp.441-442)。\n\n57","previous_page":56,"next_page":58}