{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","id":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","uuid":"4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title":"马克思的价值：当代资本主义经济学批判","normalized_title":"马克思的价值当代资本主义经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520180269","isbns":["9787520180269"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":244,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%EF%BC%9A%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%AD%A6%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4ec17d87-0309-41de-9bb0-d3dffb1b81da/search"},"page":{"printed_page":92,"pdf_page":99,"physical_index":99,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"fc98f6b95ce771f8e8398d08f3c3d4c93755bbc0711d09e8a1fd1c0e5d32178e"},"chapter":"第四章 工资和剥削","content":"第二，它在分析上空洞无意义，因为虽然根据以往经验，工人配得上在国民净收入中占有一个份额，但是，它只不过是赘述资本和劳动力两种力量的平衡，而对占有多少份额和购买哪些货物没做任何解释。仿佛劳动力的经济和社会再生产与剥削过程无关，与工资的确定无关。换句话说，定量方式设定了一个特定（但未加以解释）的消费篮子，它在后来被用于价格体系的确定；份额模式从给定（但未加以解释）的价格和工资出发，以便获得工人消费量（其构成也未加以解释）的价值。\n\n第三，份额模式预设了资本与劳动之间的关系是对称的，在这种情况下，以两大阶级的市场支配力为基础，净产值主要被两大阶级所占有。这是错误的，因为无论资本主义社会分配上的冲突多么重要，为了占有净产值而展开斗争时，利润和工资并非被同时确定的。在现实中，资本家利用工人之前创造的价值提出劳动力的价值，而且资本家保有产品售出后的剩余利润。因此，利润和工资之间的关系从根本上不同于商业利润、利息和租金之间的关系，在榨取工人的剩余价值上，这两种主张是相互冲突的：\n\n马克思的价值：当代资本主义政治经济学批判\n\n① 参见 Theories of Surplus Value 3(p. 94)，还可以参见 Theories of Surplus Value 2(p. 418)。\n\n92","previous_page":91,"next_page":93}