{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title":"Bodies in code  interfaces with digital media","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","uuid":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title":"Bodies in code  interfaces with digital media","normalized_title":"bodiesincodeinterfaceswithdigitalmedia","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","isbns":["0415970164","0415970156","9780415970167","9780415970150"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":348,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Bodies%20in%20code%20%20interfaces%20with%20digital%20media","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/search"},"page":{"printed_page":170,"pdf_page":183,"physical_index":183,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"43ee66c8285a642377b7440280e4258c99d92916e04a728d064058381a0d8c31"},"chapter":"bodies in code","content":"Relocating the Remains responds to this largely unprecedented opportunity by staging a confrontation with the image through which this line of flight can be rediscovered—by compelling its viewers to grasp within themselves this crucial gap between image and body. The affective confusion it brokers serves to catalyze a radical reconfiguration of the self beyond identity, its reconfiguration as a self rooted in the potentiality of the body, as a self essentially “out of phase” with itself.\n\nSuch being-out-of-phase with itself is, of course, the phenomenological correlate of Gilbert Simondon's conceptualization of individuation as an ongoing process continuously stretched between the domain of preindividual metastability and the never fully achieved constitution of the individual.xxxvii By offering an account of embodied life as an ongoing materialization of the human on the cusp between the individual and the preindividual, the actual and the potential,xxxviii Simondon's work thus fills in Agamben's purely formal conceptualization of the coming community, a \"community without presuppositions and without subjects,\" with a concrete account of how collective individuation takes place. If it thereby furnishes the ontological basis for singularity beyond identity, it also puts to concrete use the potential that Agamben associates with life. Because it necessarily involves the disindividuation of the individual, collective individuation (transindividuation) taps what remains preindividual, improper, potential, \"within\" the human.xxix\n\nGiven our interest in Piper's technically facilitated catalysis of affectivity as the \"medium\" for realizing postidentitarian communion, we cannot but find Simondon's theory of individuation fundamental. By conceptualizing affectivity as the experience, within the individual, of the preindividual, of its proper excess over itself (its impropriety), Simondon positions affectivity as the phenomenological correlate of singularity beyond identity. As Simondon develops it in L'Individuation Psychique et Collective, affectivity is that mode of bodily experience which mediates between the individual and the preindividual, the personal and the impersonal. Whereas perception appeals to structures already constituted in the interior of the individuated being,\n\naffectivity indicates and comprises this relation between the individualized being and preindividual reality: it is thus to a certain extent heterogeneous in relation to individualized reality, and appears to bring it something from the exterior, indicating to the individualized being that it is not a complete and closed set [ensemble] of reality. (Simondon, L'Individuation, 108)\n\nBODIES IN CODE\n\n170","previous_page":169,"next_page":171}