{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title":"Bodies in code  interfaces with digital media","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","uuid":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title":"Bodies in code  interfaces with digital media","normalized_title":"bodiesincodeinterfaceswithdigitalmedia","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","isbns":["0415970164","0415970156","9780415970167","9780415970150"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":348,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Bodies%20in%20code%20%20interfaces%20with%20digital%20media","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/search"},"page":{"printed_page":190,"pdf_page":203,"physical_index":203,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"6ae94d1364afebb79e4a997564ef46fefd9a5c8e1fa2ff94160425d1d3fca8b4"},"chapter":"bodies in code","content":"By positioning the body as the hinge that renders all space (potentially) architectural, Arakawa and Gins furnish a grounding point that will prove crucial as we explore the impact of digital design technology on space and, specifically, on the potential for space to become wearable. Their work foregrounds the role of the body as the “converter” of force into affect, thereby installing the infralinguistic, indeed infratactile, body at the very core of architectural framing.\n\nThe internal complexity of the infralinguistic body, following philosopher José Gil's conception, is precisely what informs its capacity for imaging or longitudinal perception. According to Gil, as we have seen in Chapter 1, the infralinguistic body (which, importantly, is different from the body as a biological, existential, or phantasmatic unity) mediates all forms of social power, including spatial organization and language; it does so not as a passive inscriptional surface, as in the early work of Foucault and the majority of today's theorists of the performative or socially constructed body, but rather as a wielder of power in its own right.iv Because its processing or conversion of force into affect is responsible for all meaning in the world, the infralinguistic body is instrumental in the production of all forms of social power.\n\nAs a contribution to the conceptualization of wearable space, Gil's work shows specifically how and why the body must be understood to be the source for the spatiality of space. By “exfoliating\" itself into its concrete environment, the body creates spatiality as something like a field of energy:\n\nIt is only through abstract form that information resulting from the spatialization of space is integrated. Because of its anatomical and physiological structure, the human body encodes information through its sense organs in a particular way. The form that this information takes is not, therefore, that of the perceived object (taken “in itself\"), but also depends on the structure of the body. In this sense, infralanguage acts as a primary encoder, ... organizing multiple and diverse sensuality into a unitary form. ... perception thus depends on the body organizing space in a certain way. Bodily space is the product of the double investment of the body by space (the information coming from the physical world) and the investment of space by the body (as a certain kind of receiver-encoder of this information).... The space of the body is made of plates, exfoliations, surfaces, and volumes that underpin the perception of things. These spaces \"contain\" the relations of the body to things, insofar as they are integrated in the body itself and insofar as they are translated among themselves. (130/129)8\n\nBODIES IN CODE\n\n190","previous_page":189,"next_page":191}