{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title":"Bodies in code  interfaces with digital media","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","uuid":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title":"Bodies in code  interfaces with digital media","normalized_title":"bodiesincodeinterfaceswithdigitalmedia","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","isbns":["0415970164","0415970156","9780415970167","9780415970150"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":348,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Bodies%20in%20code%20%20interfaces%20with%20digital%20media","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/search"},"page":{"printed_page":199,"pdf_page":212,"physical_index":212,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"ee61ad13e2cd609e607a50c930fb487d75785b66c330015ab996071871aaee18"},"chapter":"bodies in code","content":"Accordingly, far from calling on architecture to “become computationally coextensive with the aggregate's unfolding, so that all reaction is instantaneous\" (81), we must correlate its concrete task as a material practice in the information age with the longitudinal indetermination of the body—the way that the double delay of the digital and the affective allows the internalization of interactions with the material aggregate to constitute and maintain architecture's identity-conferring internal resonance. Does not just such an imperative motivate Eisenman's recent interest in a “new organicity” built on computation, “a new idea of flow and movement, which is a model of self-organizing, self-generating systems of organization\"? (Eisenman, “Architecture,\" 110).\n\n5. A NEW ORGANICISM\n\nThe correlation of computation and organicism becomes particularly pronounced in projects in which affect comes most centrally into play (Eisenman, you will recall, mentioned three in particular: The Virtual House, the ITT Proposal, and the Staten Island Institute). This correlation thus illustrates how the spatializing of the body and the affectivity that is its index are empowered by the computer-facilitated vectorization of space that has, following Eisenman's understanding in \"Visions Unfolding: Architecture in the Age of Electronic Media, literally transformed our lifeworld: \"The electronic paradigm directs a powerful challenge to architecture because it defines reality in terms of media and simulation, it values appearance over existence, what can be seen over what is. Not the seen as we formerly knew it, but rather a seeing that can no longer interpret.\"16\n\nNot only does digital technology thus dematerialize architectural embodiment, but it also displaces vision from its privileged position as the foundation of architecture's interiority: “Architecture, unlike any other discipline, concretized vision. The hierarchy inherent in all architectural space begins as a structure for the mind's eye.... The interiority of architecture more than any other discourse defined a hierarchy of vision articulated by inside and outside” (86). In phenomenological terms, this transformation involves nothing short of an eclipse of the role of vision and a shift to a perceptual modality anchored in affect, proprioception, and tactility—anchored, that is, in the bodily infrastructure out of which vision emerges.xii In architectural terms, this same transformation calls on us to struggle against the specter of interiority under yet another guise: the longstanding privilege of vision and the one-point perspectival system upon which it is based.\n\nWEARABLE SPACE\n\n199","previous_page":198,"next_page":200}