{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title":"Bodies in code  interfaces with digital media","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","uuid":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title":"Bodies in code  interfaces with digital media","normalized_title":"bodiesincodeinterfaceswithdigitalmedia","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","isbns":["0415970164","0415970156","9780415970167","9780415970150"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":348,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Bodies%20in%20code%20%20interfaces%20with%20digital%20media","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/search"},"page":{"printed_page":324,"pdf_page":337,"physical_index":337,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"0c502b19c61a13e3ae42815cf02f71440a1fe93e4f6849e5eef873b0facbdfa7"},"chapter":"bodies in code","content":"Merleau-Ponty, on the flesh, 53, 54, 71, 99   \nMerleau-Ponty, on the phenomenal body, 21, 51,122   \nMerleau-Ponty, on the primacy of bodily motility, 21   \nMerleau-Ponty, on touch as source of vision, 53   \nMetaplay (Krueger), 31, 32   \n\"Metastability\" (Simondon), 197, 198   \nMillon, Alain, 5, 14   \nMimicry, 127   \nMinkowski, Eugène, 132, 133   \nMinkowski, on pathological temporality, 132   \nMirror image, 12, 15, 17, 54, 58, 65, 77   \n\"Mirror stage” (Lacan), 15, 41, 55, 56, 58, 61, 154   \n\"Mixed reality,\" 2-9, 12-15, 18, 19, 21, 26, 27, 47, 84, 88, 93, 110, 136   \nMixed reality, as the condition for real experience, 8   \nMixed reality, as the general condition of phenomenalization, 9   \nMotility, 17, 21   \nMotility, spatiality of, 38   \nMotivatedness of the architectural sign\" (Eisenman), 191, 192, 195, 196   \nMotor activity, 2, 3, 8   \nMotor intentionality, 7, 21, 134   \nMotoric embodiment, 12   \nMovement, 17   \n\"Movement-vision\" (Massumi), 78   \n\"Muscular shell\" (Bick), 63   \nNakamura, Lisa, 145   \nNarcissus, 15, 16, 18   \nNatural perception, 4   \nNature (Merleau-Ponty), 21, 75, 77, 87, 91   \nNavidson Record, The, 224, 240   \nNavidson, Will, 224, 233, 234-236, 242-244, 247   \n\"Negrophobia” (Fanon), 154, 155   \nNew media ecology, 232   \nNew media, 25   \n\"New organicity\" (Eisenman), 199   \nNew Philosophy for New Media (Hansen), 91, 176, 209, 241   \nNobility of vision, 212, 217   \n\"Nobility of Vision, The” (Jonas), 53, 119   \nNovak, Marcus, 175, 220   \nNovel, 221-223, 231, 232   \nNovel, as copy with a difference, 238, 239, 245, 248-250   \nNovel, as machine for producing reality \"affects,\" 239   \nNovel, as source of exteriorization for embodied reader, 223   \nNovel, longstanding correlation with the body, 223\n\nNovel, privilege of, 233   \nNovel, shift in function because of media, 222   \nObscurity, 182   \nOcularcentrism, 113   \nOlalquiaga, Celeste, 126-128, 131, 134   \nOng, Walter, 66   \nOnline identity play, 144, 145, 148, 156, 168   \nOnline identity play, experimental function   \nof, 144   \nOperational perspective, 12, 13, 19, 39, 41, 48,   \n51, 53, 66, 67   \nOrganizational closure, 13   \nOrthographic capacity, of print, 237   \nOrthographic desire, 233   \nOrthographic function, 223   \nOrthographic mediation, 247   \nOrthographic recording, 230-233, 245, 249   \nOrthography, 226, 228, 232, 234, 241, 245   \nOrthography, eclipse of, 228, 235   \nOrthography, elective affinity with photogra  \nphy, 227, 228   \nOrthography, paradox of, 234   \nOsmose (Davies), 107-112, 123-125, 135   \nOsmose, description of, 107-110   \nOverexposed (Diller + Scofidio), 214   \nOvid, 246\n\nPara-site (Diller + Scofidio), 212, 213   \nPassing, 140, 141, 145-148, 168   \nPassing, generalized in online identity play, 156, 172   \nPassing, kinship with online interpellation, 145   \nPelafina, 225   \nPenny, Simon, 31, 45-47, 49, 40, 52, 53   \nPerception, correlation with affection, 185   \nPerceptual landing sites, see \"Landing sites\"   \nPerformance, see \"Performativity\"   \nPerformativity, 13, 140, 143   \nPerformativity, gender versus race, 146   \nPerformativity, of race and ethnicity, 140   \nPesce, Mark, 110, 137   \nPhenomenal body, 21, 40, 42, 43, 48, 51, 54- 57, 68, 122   \nPhenomenal body, as primary access to world, 41   \nPhenomenal body, power to spatialize, 66   \nPhenomenal body, self-exfoliation of, 59   \nPhenomenology of Perception, The (Merleau-Ponty), 21, 38, 41, 42, 48, 54, 76, 134   \nPhenomenology of Perception, The, relation to The Visible and the Invisible, 54   \nPhonography, 227   \nPhotography, 88, 90-92, 227, 228, 230, 236, 241   \nPhotography, elective affinity with orthography, 227, 228   \nPhotography, intentionality of, 227   \nPhotoshop, 228, 241   \nPicard, Rosalind, 175, 220   \nPiclin, Michel, 12   \nPierre Menard (Borges), 249   \nPiper, Keith, 141, 148, 149, 157-170, 172, 173   \nPiper, failure of interpellation in, 168   \nPoster, Mark, 139, 140, 143, 144, 162   \nPoster, on “virtual ethnicity,\" 162   \nPoster, on postideological and postsymbolic interpellation, 144   \nPosthumanism, 15   \nPostmodern reflexivity, 251   \nPostorthographic condition, 239, 251   \nPostorthographic text, 241   \nPotential movement (Merleau-Ponty), 42   \nPower of imaging, see Imaging, as power   \n\"Preindividual\" (Simondon), 140, 170   \nPrenoietic, as differentiated from noietic, 51   \nPrepersonal commonality, see “Commons\"   \nPrimary narcissism (Freud), 58, 60   \nPrimary tactility, 56, 68-71, 75-79, 83, 84, 86, 87, 91, 94, 111, 113, 122, 129   \nPrimary tactility, as more primordial self-rela tion of the body, 75   \nPrimordial tactility, see \"Primary tactility\"   \nPrint, capacity to mimic technical recording, 232   \nPrint, mimetic flexibility of, 237   \nPrint, privilege of, 222, 236, 237   \nProfiling,172   \nProprioception, 26, 42, 48, 66, 110-112, 117, 118, 120, 123, 125, 181, 183, 200, 212, 219, 243   \nProsthetic body, 146   \nProsthetics, 4, 98, 128   \nProtoreversibility, 83   \nPsychasthenia, 12, 51, 63, 112, 126-132, 135- 137   \nPsychasthenia, as a disturbance in embodiment, 130   \nPsychasthenia, as passage beyond body image 133   \nPsychasthenia, as phenomenological versus image-based pathology, 126   \nPsychasthenia, contemporary generalization of, 15   \nPsychasthenia, correlated with potentiality of technics, 132   \nPsychasthenia, feminist appropriation of, 130   \nPsychic Space (Krueger), 33-35   \nPynchon, Thomas, 228\n\nINDEX\n\n324","previous_page":323,"next_page":325}