{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title":"Bodies in code  interfaces with digital media","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","uuid":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title":"Bodies in code  interfaces with digital media","normalized_title":"bodiesincodeinterfaceswithdigitalmedia","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","isbns":["0415970164","0415970156","9780415970167","9780415970150"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":348,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Bodies%20in%20code%20%20interfaces%20with%20digital%20media","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/search"},"page":{"printed_page":41,"pdf_page":54,"physical_index":54,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"f983a802898b7ed2aff1dc5a8f744273021b6509d6e5697185d7a7519434c525"},"chapter":"bodies in code","content":"Elsewhere, Merleau-Ponty speaks of the body schema as a \"system of equivalents,\" an “immediately given invariant,\" a “general medium for having a world\" (141; 146).\n\nThis conception of the phenomenal body as a kind of primary access to the world (a world that includes the body) resonates with the privilege of the operational perspective granted the living (human) organism in autopoietic theory. Specifically, it establishes the phenomenal body and its operational perspective, not as a correlate of the objective body and the observational perspective, but rather as the source of both perspectives, indeed of the very possibility of having a perspective as such:\n\nIt is not a question of how the soul acts on the objective body, since it is not on the latter that it acts, but on the phenomenal body. So the question has to be reframed, and we must ask why there are two views of me and of my body: my body for me and my body for others, and how these two systems can exist together. It is indeed not enough to say that the objective body belongs to the realm of “for others,\" and my phenomenal body to that of “for me,\" and we cannot refuse to pose the problem of their relations, since the “for me” and the “for others” coexist in one and the same world... (106, emphasis added)\n\nAs the primarily active potential that gives the “for me\" and the “for others,\" the phenomenal body thus constitutes a (preobjective and presubjective) ontological figure that exceeds the scope of the Phenomenology's stated objective of rethinking consciousness through embodiment and consequently anticipates the perspective of Merleau-Ponty’s final ontology of the flesh. Indeed, because of the use to which it puts the scientific concept of the body schema, the phenomenal body comprises something more akin to Massumi's \"body without an image\"vii or philosopher José Gil's \"infralinguistic body\"viii than to any version of the body image, including the mirror image and the famous “mirror stage.\"\n\nLike the body without image and the infralinguistic body, the phenomenal body specifically draws on the intermodal or infraempirical dimension of the body schema, following Henry Head's original definition, as an unconscious postural model of the body underlying and conditioning exteroceptive sensory experience and preceding the reign, and even the differentiation, of the visual as a distinct (exteroceptive) sense.ix\n\nBODIES IN CODE\n\n41","previous_page":40,"next_page":42}