{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title":"Bodies in code  interfaces with digital media","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","uuid":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title":"Bodies in code  interfaces with digital media","normalized_title":"bodiesincodeinterfaceswithdigitalmedia","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","isbns":["0415970164","0415970156","9780415970167","9780415970150"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":348,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Bodies%20in%20code%20%20interfaces%20with%20digital%20media","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/search"},"page":{"printed_page":6,"pdf_page":19,"physical_index":19,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"b68af1387c15a06e547e65873d4f5c8f46b736130c03c934552ba327d161f5a1"},"chapter":"bodies in code","content":"is the being of the analog. This is the analog in a sense close to the technical meaning, as a continuously variable impulse or momentum that can cross from one qualitatively different medium into another. Like electricity into sound waves. Or heat into pain. Or light waves into vision. Or vision into imagination. Or noise in the ear into music in the heart. Or outside coming in. Variable continuity across the qualitatively different: continuity of transformation. (135)\n\nUnderstood in this sense, the analog creates reality out of the fusion or mixing of realms, out of transformation; not surprisingly, the body forms its primary agent: “If sensation is the analog processing by body-matter of ongoing transformative forces, then foremost among them are forces of appearing as such: of coming into being, registering as becoming. The body, sensor of change, is a transducer of the virtual\" (135).\n\nSituated against the backdrop of this understanding, the sensory integration of or interface with a concrete virtual domain (distinct from the virtual as a source of potential) would form one (particularly illustrative) instantiation of a more general sensory pattern: transformative integration of the force of the outside, of the virtual. That is why Massumi's conception of the analog conditions of virtual reality experience perfectly anticipates the contemporary shift to the mixed reality paradigm:\n\nThe sight-confining helmets of early virtual reality systems have given way to immersive and interactive environments capable of addressing other-than-visual senses, and looping sense modalities more flexibly and multiply into each other, packing more sensation into the digitally assisted field of experience—and with it, more potentialization. (142)\n\nBecause experience as such is “analog processed,\" there can be no difference in kind demarcating virtual reality (in its narrow, technicist sense) from the rest of experience; again, all reality is mixed reality.\n\n2. THE POWER OF IMAGING AND THE PRIVILEGEOF THE OPERATIONAL\n\nLet us now take a step backward to recognize the larger cultural transition in which the shift to mixed reality is embedded. The period from the early 90s until today has witnessed a veritable cascade of interest in the topic of the body, one that reached its apogée with the triumph of the cultural constructivist paradigm. It might be useful to align this triumph with a moment in the development of what (following the importation of poststructuralism into the English-speaking world) came to be called, simply, \"theory.\" Such a moment occurred—as Eve Sedgwick and Adam Frank's 1995 polemical attack on neo-Foucauldian constructivism highlights— when theory became synonymous with antiessentialist constructivism.\n\nBODIES IN CODE\n\n6","previous_page":5,"next_page":7}