{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title":"Bodies in code  interfaces with digital media","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","uuid":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title":"Bodies in code  interfaces with digital media","normalized_title":"bodiesincodeinterfaceswithdigitalmedia","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","isbns":["0415970164","0415970156","9780415970167","9780415970150"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":348,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Bodies%20in%20code%20%20interfaces%20with%20digital%20media","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/search"},"page":{"printed_page":74,"pdf_page":87,"physical_index":87,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"66e41d62d803d76d480ffb23ab9ac2cd212ea4ab6bb23994f234fae85637a50a"},"chapter":"bodies in code","content":"In a vet more radical reflection on the transduction of body and world, Merleau-Ponty clearly positions the écart constitutive of touch, the écart between the touched and the touching, as the source for the opening of the world, for the “untouchable,\" and, by extension, for the “invisible”:\n\nTo touch and to touch oneself (to touch oneself = touched-touching) They do not coincide in the body: the touching is never exactly the touched. This does not mean that they coincide “in the mind” or at the level of “consciousness.\" Something else than the body is needed for the junction to be made: it takes place in the untouchable. That of the other which I will never touch. (254)\n\nIn this further rumination on the imminence of the reversibility of double sensation, Merleau-Ponty lays bare the true ontological basis for the failure of the body to coincide with itself: Noncoincidence or \"embodied alterity\" is simply a primary condition of the being of the body. This ontological fact is precisely what makes the body part of the flesh and also, of course, what grounds the body's self-transcendence, its fundamental adherence to the world. Beneath the reciprocity of pure reflexivity and pure corporeity, activity and passivity, consciousness and matter, lies the primordial écart of tactility which, as Merleau-Ponty's descriptions attest, must be understood as a first (and “originary\") embrace of alterity, an original of the elsewhere, a Selbst that is an Other\" (254).\n\nThe fundamental self-alterity of the body goes together with a triangulation of self, things, and world, and it informs a primordial negativity of tactility, or put otherwise, tactility as the source of the body's negativity (and hence of its transcendence in immanence, its self-transcendence toward the world):\n\nTo touch is to touch oneself. To be understood as: the things are the prolongation of my body and my body is the prolongation of the world, through it the world surrounds me—If I cannot touch my own movement, this movement is entirely woven out of contacts with me—The touching oneself and the touching have to be understood as each the reverse of the other—The negativity that inhabits the touch (and which I must not minimize: it is because of it that the body is not an empirical fact, that it has ontological signification) ... is the other side or the reverse (or the other dimensionality) of sensible Being.... (255)\n\nBODIES IN CODE\n\n74","previous_page":73,"next_page":75}