{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title":"Bodies in code  interfaces with digital media","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","uuid":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title":"Bodies in code  interfaces with digital media","normalized_title":"bodiesincodeinterfaceswithdigitalmedia","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","isbns":["0415970164","0415970156","9780415970167","9780415970150"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":348,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Bodies%20in%20code%20%20interfaces%20with%20digital%20media","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/search"},"page":{"printed_page":78,"pdf_page":91,"physical_index":91,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"7df43f26f01d932182463b5e6fc4cd803bfbeb4a183b19030c1c05a3461a03af"},"chapter":"bodies in code","content":"The passage from touch to vision is, for all that, less of a shift from one to another sense than a complexification of sensation that inaugurates vision at the same time as it extends the scope of touch. That is how Merleau-Ponty explains the “captation of the tactile body by the visual image.\" Addressing Paul Schilder's example of my sensing the contact of my pipe in my hand in the mirror, Merleau-Ponty speculates on the\n\nplace of the imaginary of seeing: By seeing and its tactile equivalents, the inauguration of an inside and an outside and their exchanges, of a relation of being to what is however forever outside: The spatiality of the body is an encrustation in the space of the world (I find my hand starting from its place in the world, not starting from the axis of coordinates of my body ..). (278)\n\nIn effect, the coordination of vision and touch expands the Tastwelt so that my hand gives access to a felt space there where it is, with this space becoming incorporated as part of the reciprocity of touch. In so doing, this coordination facilitates the construction of situation-specific boundaries between inside and outside that need not coincide with the skin and that, accordingly, open the body to technical expansion\n\nYet, if the body can be thus opened to technical expansion—whether via the mirror of specular vision or the expanded Tastwelt of what (with Massumi) we might call “movement-vision\"—it is only because embodiment is essentially and orginarily technical. To see why, we have only to pass from the correlation-in-fact between touch and vision (which institutes an empirical technicity) to their correlation-in-principle (which entails an originary technicity). In the wake of such a passage, we begin to see that the transductive correlation of touching-touched and seeing rests upon a yet more primordial transduction, a transduction that, for the human as form of life, is entirely originary: the transduction of the écart as condition of embodiment and as source for the technical.\n\nBODIES IN CODE\n\n78","previous_page":77,"next_page":79}