{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title":"Bodies in code  interfaces with digital media","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","uuid":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title":"Bodies in code  interfaces with digital media","normalized_title":"bodiesincodeinterfaceswithdigitalmedia","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","isbns":["0415970164","0415970156","9780415970167","9780415970150"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":348,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Bodies%20in%20code%20%20interfaces%20with%20digital%20media","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/search"},"page":{"printed_page":81,"pdf_page":94,"physical_index":94,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"f027ebaf97972f96f51116170cdae740c4ecef4eef61623006a252f36ce9fb6b"},"chapter":"bodies in code","content":"Coupled in this way with “the endo-spatial enclosure,\" the virtual is positioned as the payoff, not of some autonomous technical accomplishment (as so many recent discussions seem to maintain), but rather of the transductive coupling of vision and touch. If the virtual here comprises a deterritorialization of the visual via its exteriorization of the body's interiority, like vision, it is deeply bound up with embodiment. Indeed, the virtual is less a new domain of vision proper than a technical extension of sensation that serves to expose tactility's role in inaugurating the coupling of interiority and exteriorization and, with it, the essential technicity of sensation.\n\nWhat the work exteriorizes, then, is not some autonomous domain of the visual, but, as Hegedüs insists, the domain of interiority: the work transforms “an ordinarily inaccessible interiority or psychic space of transcendence ... into an externalized virtual space that can be entered and explored\" (Hegedüs, [Description]). Given our earlier discussion of the transduction of interiority and exteriorization, it is interesting that this passage to exteriorization is doubled by the inverse movement, as Anne-Marie Duguet explains:\n\n[The eye, an object in the exterior, becomes a detecting subject in the interior of the sphere where it executes the points of view that are given to it by the hand. One is thus confronted with an extraordinary mobility and instability of the look; the scene regresses [se retourne] to a simple game of digits, the objects turn around and traverse one another without resistance.²4\n\nDuguet's analysis helps to underscore how Handsight, by making the hand into the operator of the eye's movement, introduces a distancing into tactility and thus allows reflection on the transduction—and perhaps, ultimately, on the indifferentiation—-between tactility and vision.\n\nBODIES IN CODE\n\n81","previous_page":80,"next_page":82}