{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title":"Bodies in code  interfaces with digital media","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","id":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","uuid":"4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title":"Bodies in code  interfaces with digital media","normalized_title":"bodiesincodeinterfaceswithdigitalmedia","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","isbns":["0415970164","0415970156","9780415970167","9780415970150"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":348,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Bodies%20in%20code%20%20interfaces%20with%20digital%20media","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4f7053d9-6508-49c8-9dd8-ec4dc5dadd53/search"},"page":{"printed_page":84,"pdf_page":97,"physical_index":97,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"289964ee8c39eff727fc973450f9d770ab6ca459b7291f9d4c7402b5a9d80b4d"},"chapter":"bodies in code","content":"Because this reciprocity between my body and the body of the other comprises an emanation from the protoreciprocity of primordial tactility, it operates an extension of the écart into the domain of collective experience. Just as the écart marks a failure of reversibility between the hand as touched and as toucher—a failure which expresses the originary form of the écart as transduction of embodiment and technics—it likewise opens an irreducible asymmetry in the reversibility between my body and the body of the other. And just as the duality of sensation (and of primordial tactility) brought with it a fundamental chance—the chance for a coupling with the flesh of the world and with things—the asymmetry that informs collective intercorporeity (the sensory common) opens the chance for an at once more concrete and more generalized coupling with technics.\n\nAccordingly, the very means facilitating my body's opening to the flesh of the world and to things give concrete expression to the transductive correlation of primary tactility, to the écart as condition of embodiment and source of technicity. Today's digital technologies and the mixed reality aesthetic that they support thus function to actualize the potential of technicity to be a medium for being. Through them, the transduction constitutive of primary tactility—the transduction of embodiment and technics, of interiority and exteriorization—becomes actualized as a technically specific and technically facilitated intercorporeal commonality.\n\nNow it should be clear that Merleau-Ponty's theorization of technics—limited to the conception of discrete prosthesis—fails to grapple with the technical “essence” of the human that, as I have suggested, lies at the heart of his conception of primary tactility and the structural coupling of the flesh of my body and of the world. To grasp this dimension of technics, then, we must turn to Gilbert Simondon, the French \"bio– techno-phenomenologist\" and student of Merleau-Ponty's, whose work takes up the thread of the latter's unfinished final project and discovers, as the necessary correlate of a complex theory of physico-bio-social individuation, a convergence of the biosocial with the technical.\n\nOn Simondon's understanding, individuation is an ongoing and interminable process, ranging from the physical (the process of crystallization is his key example) to the social; in all cases, it crucially involves a relation to the \"preindividual,\" the domain of “\"metastable\" potentiality.\n\nBODIES IN CODE\n\n84","previous_page":83,"next_page":85}