{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","title":"生产：德勒兹机器（第五辑）","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787563370245","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","id":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","uuid":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","title":"生产：德勒兹机器（第五辑）","normalized_title":"生产德勒兹机器第五辑","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787563370245","isbns":["9787563370245"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":408,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%94%9F%E4%BA%A7%EF%BC%9A%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%9C%BA%E5%99%A8%EF%BC%88%E7%AC%AC%E4%BA%94%E8%BE%91%EF%BC%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/search"},"page":{"printed_page":229,"pdf_page":234,"physical_index":234,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"49ba4c0f1daaaecb71ba1b3b1c120fb41d6b503f0c5fbaa919a9679e23f44bcc"},"chapter":"PRNG","content":"一种生命无处不有，在各个时刻穿越这个和那个活着的主体，衡量各种经历过的客体—内在性生命携带着只能在主体和客体中实现自身的事件或单一性。这种未界定的生命本身没有时间的刻度，不管它们彼此可能有多么接近；它只有时间的间隙[entre-temps]，时刻的间隙[entre-moments]。它既不跟随以前的时间，也不接续后来的时间，而只呈现空旷时间(emptytime)的无限，在那里，人们在一种绝对的即时意识中看到未来的事件和已经发生过的事件。34]\n\n在《什么是哲学?》的结尾，在德勒兹晚期哲学最重要的段落之一中，作为绝对即时性的生命被界定为“不用知识的纯思辨”。这里，德勒兹区别了理解生机论的两种可能的方式，第一种是无本质的行为，第二种是无行动的潜能：\n\n生机论一直有两种可能的解读：一个是有行动但无实存的理念，因而只从大脑的外部知识的观点来看才采取行动(从康德到克洛德·贝尔纳)；另一个有实存但无行动的力，因而是一种纯粹的意图觉识(从莱布尼兹到吕耶)。如果在我们看来第二种解读是必要的，那是由于具有保存作用的养性与行动甚至运动永远是脱节的，它表现为一种不用知识的纯思辨。[35]\n\n绝对的内在性\n\n229","previous_page":228,"next_page":230}