{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","title":"生产：德勒兹机器（第五辑）","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787563370245","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","id":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","uuid":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","title":"生产：德勒兹机器（第五辑）","normalized_title":"生产德勒兹机器第五辑","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787563370245","isbns":["9787563370245"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":408,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%94%9F%E4%BA%A7%EF%BC%9A%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%9C%BA%E5%99%A8%EF%BC%88%E7%AC%AC%E4%BA%94%E8%BE%91%EF%BC%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/search"},"page":{"printed_page":232,"pdf_page":237,"physical_index":237,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"7b37a5f62f9ef97aad4946f94091247c216a07167262b3f530af6e30940b32f3"},"chapter":"PRNG","content":"至福\n\n由此看来，弗朗索瓦·艾华德以《欲望与快感》(Desire andPleasure)为题发表的德勒兹论福柯的书札就含有一个重要的定义。德勒兹说，生命根本不是自然，而是“欲望多变的内在性场域”。鉴于我们所知的德勒兹所说的内在性，这意味着“生命”这个术语指的恰恰就是内在于自身的欲望。显然，对德勒兹而言，欲望既不意味着他性也不意味着缺乏。但如何想象这样一种欲望始终内在于自身呢？或换言之，怎么能以欲望的形式来想象绝对的内在性呢?根据斯宾诺莎的《希伯来简明语法》来提出这个问题:怎么可能想象这样一种欲望运动，它不离开自身，仅仅作为内在性原因，作为散步，作为欲望着的欲望的自我构成呢?\n\n斯宾诺莎把“努力”看作是要保存自身存在的欲望，这个理论可能包含着这些问题的一个答案，德勒兹也经常强调这个理论的重要性。不管斯宾诺莎的观点是来自古代还是中世纪(哈里·A.沃尔夫森列出了许多人，从斯多葛派到但丁)，肯定的是，在每种情况中，其悖谬的表述完美地表现了一种内在性运动的观念，努力总是固执地存留在自身之内。一切存在者不仅坚持其自身的存在，而且渴望这么做。因此，努力的运动就与斯宾诺莎的内在性原因相重合，其中，施事者和受事者无法分辨。而且，既然努力与物的存在相认同，那么，渴望坚持自身的存在就是渴望自己的欲望，将自我构成欲望。在努力中，欲望与存在就这样不留残余地\n\n德勒兹机器 生产 第五辑\n\n232","previous_page":231,"next_page":233}