{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","title":"生产：德勒兹机器（第五辑）","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787563370245","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","id":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","uuid":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","title":"生产：德勒兹机器（第五辑）","normalized_title":"生产德勒兹机器第五辑","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787563370245","isbns":["9787563370245"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":408,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%94%9F%E4%BA%A7%EF%BC%9A%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%9C%BA%E5%99%A8%EF%BC%88%E7%AC%AC%E4%BA%94%E8%BE%91%EF%BC%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/search"},"page":{"printed_page":247,"pdf_page":252,"physical_index":252,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"6fa515d3ca7db4bd3985427316f10ae9567328efb0124436718443a411d3c174"},"chapter":"PRNG","content":"最后，由于对他所处时代的每一方面都抱有新奇之感，调节自已的思想使之适应事件的闪光外表，同时使他那魔幻般的写作适应意义在不同地带的穿行，人们认为德勒兹实际上是向古典的莱布尼茨作出了让步，发明了当代的巴洛克，在这种巴洛克中，我们对多、混合以及摆脱共同规则的多元宇宙的共存—也就是行星民主主义—的欲求就能够达到自我实现而展开它的褶子了。简言之，我们的德勒兹是思考世界混淆的快乐的思想家。\n\n一的更新的概念\n\n在哲学上，世界的混淆无疑首先意味着它既不能解释为一，也不能解释为多。这个世界并未被放在意义的可识别的运动(比如，历史的意义)之内，也没有一成不变地被分成或实际分解为表意的因素(如把无产阶级与资产阶级清楚地分离开来，赋予帝国主义、社会主义和非联合阵营之间的游戏以意义的那些人的观点）。德勒兹最初确实宣布放弃根据一和多来分配存在，任何现代思想所采取的方法论最初都要把自身放在这种对立之外。对他来说，重复之所以是一个主要的本体论概念，恰恰因为它既不能被看作一的永恒性，也不能被看作多的可识别的术语，而是超越这种对立：\n\n《存在的喧嚣》(节选)\n\n247","previous_page":246,"next_page":248}