{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","title":"生产：德勒兹机器（第五辑）","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787563370245","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","id":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","uuid":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","title":"生产：德勒兹机器（第五辑）","normalized_title":"生产德勒兹机器第五辑","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787563370245","isbns":["9787563370245"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":408,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%94%9F%E4%BA%A7%EF%BC%9A%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%9C%BA%E5%99%A8%EF%BC%88%E7%AC%AC%E4%BA%94%E8%BE%91%EF%BC%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/search"},"page":{"printed_page":288,"pdf_page":293,"physical_index":293,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"c50d481d3b3e0f114a567f96a4ad87487fd03b014c88b683a34250e147be3546"},"chapter":"PRNG","content":"历史哲学的口吃\n\n德勒兹对外部的热爱也见于他的历史哲学著作。没有人可以指责他在以自己的名义著书之前没有在历史哲学领域付出长期艰苦的劳动。(“不读柏拉图、笛卡儿、康德和海德格尔以及某某写的关于他们的书你怎么能思考呢?”德勒兹在《对话》中颇具讽刺意味地问道。)[4]他那给人留下深刻印象的论述休谟、尼采、柏格森、康德、斯宾诺莎和莱布尼茨的专著，有关柏拉图、斯多葛派、伊壁鸠鲁派的讨论，显示出他对那些“部分属于哲学史、但在某一方面或整体上逃脱哲学史”的口吃同行的偏爱。[5]他解读他们的方法不是寻找隐蔽的所指。事实上，德勒兹试图“从中间”掌握他们的文本，拒绝根据他们论点的次序或“论据的次序”一步步紧随他们。他推动论点和论据，使它们快速到达没影点，他加速或减速论证的方式与我们加速或减速实验器皿中的液体毫无二致，最终控制了思想家用来生产和提出问题的机器一口吃。自自面\n\n德勒兹的思想不能包含在现在流行的文本寓言的问题框架之中。他理论介入的核心是表述一种关于改造或变化的理论，或如他自己喜欢说的，一种纯粹生成的理论，这种理论与充分表达它的语言一道足能抵制所有同一性理论的压制。正是表述这种改造和变化理论的不懈努力(而不是对语言符号的辩证批评性质的痴迷)促使德勒兹用差异代替了存在，生成差异的重复代替了线性时间。\n\n恰恰是为了一种关于改造的理论，德勒兹才在他的全部著作中反思事件的本质、多元的结构、个性化的要求、他者的诱惑、事件的伦理和永恒轮回中重复的能动力和选择力。他探讨了大民族语言和小民族语言之间的论争关系，阐释了位于移民和定居政治策略中间的流动的游牧差异，把这些研究的结果从属于关于改造的理论。\n\n德勒兹机器\n\n第五辑\n\n288","previous_page":287,"next_page":289}