{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","title":"生产：德勒兹机器（第五辑）","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787563370245","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","id":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","uuid":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","title":"生产：德勒兹机器（第五辑）","normalized_title":"生产德勒兹机器第五辑","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787563370245","isbns":["9787563370245"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":408,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%94%9F%E4%BA%A7%EF%BC%9A%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%9C%BA%E5%99%A8%EF%BC%88%E7%AC%AC%E4%BA%94%E8%BE%91%EF%BC%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/search"},"page":{"printed_page":291,"pdf_page":296,"physical_index":296,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"c2409950d69751142d97481447d2f10d422ba1b93f24e157c287acdc5f0e48c6"},"chapter":"PRNG","content":"尼采\n\n柏格森的强度时间理论蕴涵着记忆和重复的深刻含义。记忆就是过去在现在的时间间隙中的重复，这假定了过去和现在之间不可简约的间隙，突出了德里达已经维系于文字的传播的“原始延宕”。但是德勒兹并没有被说服。柏格森的记忆/重复在没有永恒轮回的时间的情况下会使过去和现在固定，而且减弱使柏格森的文本充满活力的对不可简约的多元性的直觉认识。难道柏拉图的回忆终究还不足以警告我们不要信任摩涅莫辛涅(记忆女神)，不让它追逐“一”的阴影吗？协兆费到与左再一拍志意\n\n于是，德勒兹将注意力转向尼采的永恒轮回，让其承载从《存在与时间》到《差异与重复》的转移。但是为了使这次转移令人信服，德勒兹必须把传统的重复/循环与产生差异的重复区别开来。他在《尼采与哲学》[12]和《尼采》[13]中进行了这项研究。传统的重复利用同一性实体构成了相同概念的扩展，只通过数字差异将它们彼此分开。德勒兹把这种差异称作概念外部的差异。\n\n“造成差异”的重复是强度的，而现在和过去的循环重复却是外延的。这个概念是理式问题的影子，因为一个概念的外延也就是一系列详细的例子。但理式作为一个结构则是一个集中的强度，它的本质随着理式的分化或再分化而变化。理式问题在重复中循环，在概念的解决中突出自身的特点。但是，正如德勒兹所论证的，任何概念对于理式来说都不是自足的，循环的重复永远不能穷尽或再现理式内部固有的差异的本质。正是没有自足的直觉的理式产生了问题并提供了临时的解决办法；后者在概念及其扩展的周围晶莹剔透，但一段时间之后就又再次被新的强度和新的问题所颠覆了良自输干土素干关是，世\n\n德勒兹的几个主题\n\n291","previous_page":290,"next_page":292}