{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","title":"生产：德勒兹机器（第五辑）","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787563370245","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","id":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","uuid":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","title":"生产：德勒兹机器（第五辑）","normalized_title":"生产德勒兹机器第五辑","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787563370245","isbns":["9787563370245"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":408,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%94%9F%E4%BA%A7%EF%BC%9A%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%9C%BA%E5%99%A8%EF%BC%88%E7%AC%AC%E4%BA%94%E8%BE%91%EF%BC%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/search"},"page":{"printed_page":292,"pdf_page":297,"physical_index":297,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"f8d5f5d7e9ed5a44e3400fedce367016c533ba000a0308286aec94cb8fb47ce9"},"chapter":"PRNG","content":"德勒兹从这些例子和对尼采永恒轮回思想的反思中得出的结论是，重复就是某种方式的行为，但总是与独特的、不具有相似性或平等的事物相关。尼采所说的重复是例外、僭越、差异。与康德的审美理式一样，重复是一种独特的直觉，没有任何概念能充分地表现它。瞥见这种独特的、僭越的和无中心的中心正是尼采的特权和使命；他称其为“权力意志”。中间回最\n\n如尼采所理解的，这个权力意志不是通过从权力那里剥夺的力来刻意追求权力，而是对力本身就是的那种权力的表达。“权力的意志”意思是说权力本身在意志，这是对权力意志的正确解读。传统的刻意解读把权力作为再现的对象，希望获得力所缺乏的东西，因此与尼采关于力的理论相矛盾。据德勒兹所说，指望对权力意志的这样一种再现式解读能促进获得认可或攫取权力的斗争，并因此昭示价值，这是对尼采有关主体观点的误解。[14]\n\n斯多葛学派\n\n关于纯粹生成的理论的阐述预示了对柏拉图主义的颠覆和对这种差异所支持的伦理选择的拒斥。但是关于纯粹生成和改造的一种理论只能是由悖论和系列构成的理论。“它同时既大于以前所是的，又小于将要生成的东西。”[15]表述性逻辑不足以处理纯粹的生成。德勒兹需要一种事件的逻辑，一种生成感觉的逻辑，在《感觉的逻辑》中他真诚地开始寻找这样一种逻辑。\n\n在这部著作中，德勒兹广泛讨论了斯多葛学派。按照德勒兹的理解，自斯多葛学派开始人们才认真对待柏拉图主义的垮台:哲学思考事件，用正确的工具讨论变化、改造和生成。自埃利亚的芝诺开始，哲学就懂得不能将生成看作是时空固定片段的纯粹并置。\n\n德勒兹机器 生产 第五辑\n\n292","previous_page":291,"next_page":293}