{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","title":"生产：德勒兹机器（第五辑）","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787563370245","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","id":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","uuid":"54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","title":"生产：德勒兹机器（第五辑）","normalized_title":"生产德勒兹机器第五辑","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787563370245","isbns":["9787563370245"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":408,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%94%9F%E4%BA%A7%EF%BC%9A%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%9C%BA%E5%99%A8%EF%BC%88%E7%AC%AC%E4%BA%94%E8%BE%91%EF%BC%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/54d3c118-c4aa-4f73-931a-46b5161e4e39/search"},"page":{"printed_page":337,"pdf_page":342,"physical_index":342,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"b930a3b772414464897a032dc2cf6b8c6a523d6f46937a27bb48c3e4ab278c8e"},"chapter":"PRNG","content":"尽管“视角”不一样，海德格尔和德勒兹都为轮回中的此刻作了辩护—而这正是侏儒所无法理解的。德勒兹的“此刻”是肯定生成，海德格尔的“此刻”肯定了命运的决断。但德勒兹反对海德格尔的解释。德勒兹反对将永恒轮回看做是存在者的轮回，他们对同一物的理解不一样。这个同一物，海德格尔非常明确地强调，是存在者，是一个有限世界的有限存在者，轮回是存在者的轮回。此刻是存在者的此刻，为什么看重此刻？正是因为存在者在这过去和未来的冲突之际要作出决断，此刻决定了命运和轮回的选择。而德勒兹反对将“同一物”解释为存在者，不是同一物的轮回，不是存在者(不是一种事物，不是一种事件)的轮回。那么，什么是这个同一物？轮回本身是这个同一物。“永恒轮回中的同一物描述的不是轮回之物的本质，而是不同之物轮回的事实”。轮回本身就是存在，“轮回只要肯定生成和流逝就构成存在”。[53]轮回本身就是事件，从这个意义上而言，永恒轮回就是生成之存在。轮回是生成之在。轮回本身是存在。为什么轮回构成了存在？轮回是一种必然性事实，“同一物”在此不是指一种物或者人，而是事件必然轮回的事件，事件的轮回性，必然的轮回性。德勒兹就此将存在者，将主体信仰从永恒轮回中清除掉了，永恒轮回由此变成了一个单纯的理论命题，而非一个历史命题，这一命题不再针对着(或者说不再仅仅是针对着)查拉图斯特拉遭遇的现代性背景，而是针对着整个哲学史背景。永恒轮回就此脱离了置身于历史中的查拉图斯特拉，而成为尼采的一般哲学原则。古\n\n论尼采的“永恒轮回”\n\n337","previous_page":336,"next_page":338}