{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title":"人工智能政治哲学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208189485","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","uuid":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title":"人工智能政治哲学","normalized_title":"人工智能政治哲学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208189485","isbns":["9787208189485"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":261,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BA%BA%E5%B7%A5%E6%99%BA%E8%83%BD%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":168,"pdf_page":184,"physical_index":184,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"c8e03e349fc77977769e786a044c2550f47746cb6d137aa4eac148a17d090fd4"},"chapter":"第六章 非人类怎么办？环境政治与后人类主义","content":"让我来解读这套后人类主义理论，首先要强调他们对动物和自然环境的不同态度。哈拉维是后人类主义的关键人物。她在《赛博格宣言》(Cyborg Manifesto)(2000)中进行了“政治-虚构（政治-科学）分析”，以赛博格（同时是动物和机器的生物）的形象跨越了自然与人工的分野，之后她至少从两个方面论证了致力于动物繁荣的政治。首先，她认为存在“伴侣物种”(companionspecies)(Haraway 2003)，比如狗，我们与这些非人类重要动物的关系、共同生活以及最终的共同进化导致了彼此身份的共同构成。基于这一观点，我们可以主张至少给予那些作为伴侣物种的动物以道德和政治地位。其次，哈拉维提出了制造亲缘（makingkin）和多物种政治（multispecies politics）的概念，进一步为动物打开了政治的边界。关于人类世的讨论强调了人类在塑造地球时的能动性，针对这一讨论，她认为不仅人类改造了地球，其他“地球改造者”(terraformers)，如细菌，也改造了地球，并且生物物种和技术之间存在许多相互影响的行为。哈拉维（2015）认为，政治应促进“包括人类在内的丰富的多物种组合的繁荣”，但也应促进“超出人类”（more-than-human）和“人类之外”（other-than-human）的繁荣。基于这种“复合主义者”（composist）的观点，政治体被扩展为各种实体，我们可以与它们建立联系，也必须对它们作出回应。正如哈拉维在《与麻烦共存》(Staying with the Trouble)(2016）一书中所说：我们有责任“为多物种的繁荣创造条件”，这种回应形成了纽带，创造了新的亲缘关系。然而，她在注脚中警告不要以偏概全，强调要尊重多样性和历史状况，并将其与人类政治（尤其是美国政治）直接联系起来：\n\n人工智能政治哲学\n\n168","previous_page":167,"next_page":169}