{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title":"人工智能政治哲学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208189485","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","uuid":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title":"人工智能政治哲学","normalized_title":"人工智能政治哲学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208189485","isbns":["9787208189485"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":261,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BA%BA%E5%B7%A5%E6%99%BA%E8%83%BD%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":169,"pdf_page":185,"physical_index":185,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"911309ca88d73779787f7d537e9668c842054193fad3eaba3f0609d141f93a4f"},"chapter":"第六章 非人类怎么办？环境政治与后人类主义","content":"亲缘关系的建立必须尊重不同历史情境的多样亲缘关系，不能为了急功近利地追求共同人性、多物种集体或类似类别而将亲缘政治泛化或侵占…在非裔美国人和盟友组织起来反对警察谋杀黑人和其他暴行之后，美国许多白人自由主义者通过主张“所有命都是命”来抵制“黑人的命也是命”，这种令人遗憾的景象很有启发意义。建立联盟需要认识到具体情况、优先事项和紧迫性……如果不考虑过去和现在的殖民政策和其他灭绝和/或同化政策，就打算建立亲缘，这至少可以说是“家庭”功能失调的征兆。（207）\n\n另一位后人类主义者沃尔夫（Wolfe）探讨了福柯的生命权力和生命政治概念对“跨物种关系”的影响（Wolfe 2010，126）。在《法律面前：生命政治框架中的人类和其他动物》(Before the Law:Humans and Other Animals in a Biopolitical Frame )( 2013) —书中,他质疑了从亚里士多德到海德格尔的西方传统中对动物的排斥。他批评了海德格尔关于人性与动物性是“在本体论上对立的区域”(ontologically opposed zones）的假设（5-6)，并利用生命政治学的概念——受福柯的启发（Wolfe2017）——论证了我们在法律面前都是动物：\n\n第六章 非人类怎么办？环境政治与后人类主义\n\n169","previous_page":168,"next_page":170}