{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title":"人工智能政治哲学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208189485","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","uuid":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title":"人工智能政治哲学","normalized_title":"人工智能政治哲学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208189485","isbns":["9787208189485"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":261,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BA%BA%E5%B7%A5%E6%99%BA%E8%83%BD%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":178,"pdf_page":194,"physical_index":194,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"355ecdc0cad7c3c3fefef885c9e2e2fe2ecbb9aa662c82277323785253151055"},"chapter":"第六章 非人类怎么办？环境政治与后人类主义","content":"此外，一旦我们将人类从中心移除，地缘政治——在此被定义为地球或星球政治——就需要重新定义。从非人类中心主义的角度出发，并与上述后人类主义思想保持一致，谈论人类世已不再合适，因为这可能意味着人类是或者应该是中心并控制着一切。相反，重要的是要强调我们与许多其他生物共享地球和这个星球。也许人类已经被预设着一种超级能动性，并将地球及其人类和非人类居民视为自己的飞船，在人工智能和其他技术的帮助下，可以而且必须对其进行管理，甚至重新设计但这正是问题所在，而不是解决办法。非人类中心主义的人工智能政治将减少以技术为主义，并对这种态度和做事方式提出疑问：这将意味着质疑人工智能作为解决我们所有问题的方法，并至少考虑放松我们对地球的控制，而不是通过人工智能和数据科学来加强控制。一旦我们质疑技术解决主义（Morozov 2013）或布鲁萨德（Broussard2019）所说的“技术沙文主义”（technochauvinism）——认为技术永远是解决方案——我们就不再将人工智能视为解决我们所有问题的神奇方案，而会更加关注它为我们和非人类所做事情的局限性。\n\n人工智能政治哲学\n\n178","previous_page":177,"next_page":179}