{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title":"人工智能政治哲学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208189485","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","uuid":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title":"人工智能政治哲学","normalized_title":"人工智能政治哲学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208189485","isbns":["9787208189485"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":261,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BA%BA%E5%B7%A5%E6%99%BA%E8%83%BD%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":41,"pdf_page":57,"physical_index":57,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"e2c048de29709361c90b0835a5c5d99f68cb00ad18826781ff11f0ea8d8f1f45"},"chapter":"第二章 自由：人工智能操纵与机器人奴役","content":"在自由民主社会中，自由讨论和思想交流尤为重要。人们可以运用政治哲学与密尔提出相同的观点，即剥夺言论自由有可能扼杀思想辩论。在《论自由》(OnLiberty）中，密尔为自由表达意见辩护的理由是，如果不这样做，我们就会陷入“思想绥靖”(intellectual pacification)，而不是敢于将论点推向其逻辑极限的思想。然而，在密尔看来，意见自由并不是绝对的，从这个意义上说，应该防止人们对他人造成伤害（著名的伤害原则）。在英语国家的自由主义传统中，这通常被解释为对个人权利的伤害。在密尔看来，这就是不伤害其他个人，最终实现个人幸福的最大化。然而，在哲学共和主义的传统中，问题的关键并不在于会对个人造成伤害。问题在于，仇恨言论、操纵和误导会危及政治参与和政治自我实现的自由、人的道德尊严和共同利益。因此，所造成的伤害是对政治本身造成的可能性的伤害。这种哲学共和主义似乎至少在一个面向上与密尔的论证相吻合：言论自由的意义不在于表达本身，而在于政治论证和思想辩论。这才是应该受到尊重的自由。如果我们允许言论自由，我们实质是在尊重人的尊严，并且（我们可以从共和主义的角度补充）促进讨论，从而实现共同利益和进一步实现人性。\n\n第二章 自由：人工智能操纵与机器人奴役\n\n041","previous_page":40,"next_page":42}