{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title":"人工智能政治哲学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208189485","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","uuid":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title":"人工智能政治哲学","normalized_title":"人工智能政治哲学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208189485","isbns":["9787208189485"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":261,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BA%BA%E5%B7%A5%E6%99%BA%E8%83%BD%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":83,"pdf_page":99,"physical_index":99,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"84c70d4eef79c82a7c0463112166c60dafd30308ee5249763380614bba07fc39"},"chapter":"第四章 民主：回音室与机器极权主义","content":"这种观点在现代发生了变化，新出现的人性论和政治观念认为，多数人而不仅仅是少数人能够自我统治。例如，卢梭的思想也旨在避免暴政，但在他看来，柏拉图式的权威问题的解决办法，不是让受过教育的少数人来统治，而是对全体公民的教育：只要全体公民都接受道德教育，自治就是可能的，也是可取的(Rousseau1997)。卢梭因此奠定了政治理论中另一种思想的基础，其信任民主，将自治扩大到所有公民身上，并为自治增加了一些条件。但这种自治应具备哪些条件，采取何种形式呢？他指出，民主社会不应该由哲学王统治是一回事；具体说明民主需要哪些知识（如果有的话），以及确定民主应该采取的确切形式又是另一回事。例如，民主是否应该包括协商和参与？人工智能与这种民主形式有什么关系？\n\n让我们从有关知识与民主的问题开始。在政治理论中，与我们的讨论相关的一个讨论是技术官僚制/民主的争论。这一争论始于柏拉图（如果没有更早的话)，随着现代官僚机构的兴起而具有了新的意义。近几十年来，人们一直在呼吁数据驱动决策、智能治理以及科学、循证政策，这与呼吁参与式治理和更激进的民主形式形成了矛盾。这些不同论点和语言之间的分歧（Gilley2016）反映了我们对知识和专业技能在政治中所起的作用的对立观点。\n\n第四章 民主：回音室与机器极权主义\n\n083","previous_page":82,"next_page":84}