{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title":"人工智能政治哲学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208189485","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","uuid":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title":"人工智能政治哲学","normalized_title":"人工智能政治哲学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208189485","isbns":["9787208189485"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":261,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BA%BA%E5%B7%A5%E6%99%BA%E8%83%BD%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":93,"pdf_page":109,"physical_index":109,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"370287bfbf34552c91278b0e3bbd3fa13aad0532a555c9d0a643ae9dda35e0cd"},"chapter":"第四章 民主：回音室与机器极权主义","content":"受墨菲和朗西埃的影响，法卡斯（Farkas）和舒尔（Schou）（2020）在假新闻和“后真相”的争论中，反对将民主理念等同于“在一种先验的方式之下的理性、合理性和真理”。他们对威胁民主的仅仅是谎言这一观点提出了质疑。与哈贝马斯相反，他们与墨菲和朗西埃一致，认为民主是不断发展的，是政治和社会斗争的目标。他们还质疑代议制民主：民主不仅仅是投票，理性无法拯救民主。他们反对以真理为基础的解决方案，反对政治共同体的单一模式，反对理性共识的理想，反对将共识建立在真理和理性的基础上。相反，民主总是产生不同的真理（而不是大写的“T”的真理)，而且有多种依据或基础；如果说民主与真理有关，那这种真理就是差异性、多元性和多样性：\n\n第四章 民主：回音室与机器极权主义\n\n093","previous_page":92,"next_page":94}