{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title":"人工智能政治哲学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208189485","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","uuid":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title":"人工智能政治哲学","normalized_title":"人工智能政治哲学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208189485","isbns":["9787208189485"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":261,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BA%BA%E5%B7%A5%E6%99%BA%E8%83%BD%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":96,"pdf_page":112,"physical_index":112,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"586d09178720fe56b83ac855848ade4d820e20383f07bc25b0d1962826f48dd0"},"chapter":"第四章 民主：回音室与机器极权主义","content":"但是，如果民主需要更多的协商和参与，那么人工智能的作用是什么？它能否有助于本章讨论的理论家们所设想的那种协商、沟通、参与和想象力？或者它仅仅是操纵选民的工具，更广泛地说是“把人变成物（数据）”的工具？它能否有助于公共推理，抑或是对这种理想的一种威胁？因为它提出的建议以及提出建议的方式可能并不透明，而且—至少就机器学习而言—它的工作方式与推理或判断毫无关系。人们（包括政治家）是否有足够的知识和技能来处理人工智能和数据科学提供的信息，还是说我们掌握在技术精英的手中，他们知道什么对我们有利？用斯坎伦（Scanlon）的话说，如果人工智能提出了一条“任何人都无法合理拒绝”的规则怎么办（Scanlon 1998，153)？人工智能主要是为柏拉图式的治理模式创造环境，还是有可能实现哈贝马斯或杜威式的民主？人工智能是否会被用于理性和客观的一方，从而有可能对抗被认为过于感性的人们？它是否也能在论争式的激进民主中发挥作用，包括保持差异和促进所有人的解放？进一步讨论这些问题的一种方法是指出信息气泡和回音室的问题，我们现在来谈谈这些问题。\n\n人工智能政治哲学\n\n096","previous_page":95,"next_page":97}