{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title":"人工智能政治哲学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208189485","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","uuid":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title":"人工智能政治哲学","normalized_title":"人工智能政治哲学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208189485","isbns":["9787208189485"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":261,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BA%BA%E5%B7%A5%E6%99%BA%E8%83%BD%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":97,"pdf_page":113,"physical_index":113,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"95f27d811e2511248835a343e9aa3c7758a8915788e562c01f67fd82abfba776"},"chapter":"第四章 民主：回音室与机器极权主义","content":"信息气泡、回音室和民粹主义\n\n基于这些协商式民主和论争式民主的理念，我们可以提出，人工智能等智能技术应有助于通过社交媒体实现更加广泛的、更具包容性的政治参与。但是，我们应该考虑到这些技术在知识方面的挑战和局限性。\n\n互联网和社交媒体的一些问题在媒体研究中早已广为人知。例如，桑斯坦（2001）分析了与个性化、碎片化和两极化相关的问题，帕里泽（Pariser2011）认为个性化会产生过滤气泡（filterbubble)，限制我们的视野。但现在，社交媒体和人工智能的结合加剧了这些趋势。这个问题被表述为信息气泡和回音室（Niyazov2019)：个性化算法向人们提供他们可能会感兴趣的信息，其结果是人们被隔离在气泡中，在那里他们自己的信念得到了强化，而不会接触到相反的观点。这使得古丁（Goodin2003）所设想的政治想象力变得更加困难：它似乎会阻碍而不是促进移情政治(empathic forms of politics)。政治两极分化也更加严重，这使得达成共识和采取集体行动成为不可能，存在着社会分裂和瓦解的风险。人们认为社交媒体问题尤为严重：虽然印刷出版物、电视和广播都有自己的回音室，但它们仍然“实行一定程度的编辑控制”(Diamond2019，22)。而社交媒体的回音室缺乏这种控制，从而导致两极分化和仇恨语言。\n\n第四章 民主：回音室与机器极权主义\n\n097","previous_page":96,"next_page":98}