{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title":"人工智能政治哲学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208189485","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","id":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","uuid":"56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title":"人工智能政治哲学","normalized_title":"人工智能政治哲学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208189485","isbns":["9787208189485"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":261,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BA%BA%E5%B7%A5%E6%99%BA%E8%83%BD%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/56fa816e-042b-40dd-9a08-6bc236c079d8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":99,"pdf_page":115,"physical_index":115,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"03ad8dec7a3f7bf89c6970d6ac011a1de86fe79153c941e47fad12ac801a01d7"},"chapter":"第四章 民主：回音室与机器极权主义","content":"然而，根据协商民主的理念，民主不仅仅是交换意见，而且超越了短暂的忧虑。例如，协商民主的理念是关于理性的公共使用，包括商议如何在更长的时间内共同生活及承担义务。本哈比(Benhabib)(在 2008 年 Wahl-Jorgensen的采访中）反对将民主简化为通过互联网“不受约束地交换意见”的观点，也反对忽视长期“行动承诺”的观点，例如将部分收入捐献给社区。人工智能还可能威胁到哈贝马斯、阿伦特等人所设想的沟通理性和公共领域。本哈比认为，“如何将这些传播、信息和舆论建构的网络与公众决策性表达之间的互动进行概念化”是一个挑战。\n\n从知识的角度来看，我们可以认为回音室威胁着民主的认知基础至少根据协商式民主、参与式民主和共和式民主是如此。正如金基德（Kinkead）和道格拉斯（Douglas)(2020）所阐述的那样：从卢梭、密尔到哈贝马斯、古丁和埃斯特伦德等政治思想家都相信民主的认知力量、美德和正当性，因为自由的公开辩论允许我们追踪真相，分享和讨论各种观点。然而，社交媒体与大数据分析的结合改变了政治传播的本质：现在不再需要通过广播将自己的观点显露在公众的讨论和监督之下，而是可以向世界各地的许多人发送极具针对性的信息，从而在全球范围内“窄播（narrowcast）政治信息”。这将带来认知上的影响：\n\n第四章 民主：回音室与机器极权主义\n\n099","previous_page":98,"next_page":100}