{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"5aba73df-238c-4ba0-bd59-c6ff3e9099f3","title":"虚拟资本：金融怎样挪用我们的未来","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300330303","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"5aba73df-238c-4ba0-bd59-c6ff3e9099f3","id":"5aba73df-238c-4ba0-bd59-c6ff3e9099f3","uuid":"5aba73df-238c-4ba0-bd59-c6ff3e9099f3","title":"虚拟资本：金融怎样挪用我们的未来","normalized_title":"虚拟资本金融怎样挪用我们的未来","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300330303","isbns":["9787300330303"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":236,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/5aba73df-238c-4ba0-bd59-c6ff3e9099f3","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%99%9A%E6%8B%9F%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%EF%BC%9A%E9%87%91%E8%9E%8D%E6%80%8E%E6%A0%B7%E6%8C%AA%E7%94%A8%E6%88%91%E4%BB%AC%E7%9A%84%E6%9C%AA%E6%9D%A5","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/5aba73df-238c-4ba0-bd59-c6ff3e9099f3/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/5aba73df-238c-4ba0-bd59-c6ff3e9099f3/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/5aba73df-238c-4ba0-bd59-c6ff3e9099f3","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/5aba73df-238c-4ba0-bd59-c6ff3e9099f3/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/5aba73df-238c-4ba0-bd59-c6ff3e9099f3/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"II / 141","pdf_page":179,"physical_index":179,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"cec4bf159816dcdc2c14c9aa793031b631335d49abedf91ac685fa9ee013c177"},"chapter":"虚拟资本金融怎样挪用我们的未来","content":"从古典政治经济学和马克思主义政治经济学（假定利润用于再投资）以及后凯恩斯主义经济学家采用的卡莱茨基观点(资本家花多少钱就赚多少钱，主要指投资）来看，这种结构都令人费解。\n\n那么，我们该如何解释这种情况呢？首先，我们可以援引之前研究过的一个现象，即金融部门在整个经济中的重要性增加了。与商业和工业活动相比，这个专门从事货币交易的部门很少进行固定资本投资。但这并不能帮助我们澄清图8-2中描述的现象，因为它只涉及非金融企业。这种现象通常被解释为一种。金融寄生—金融市场的需求对企业的收入产生掠夺性消耗，促使企业减少投资、压低工资。这就是洛朗·科多尼耶（Laurent Cordonnier）和他的合著者故意称为“资本成本”的东西（Cordonnier et al.，2013）他们的著作描绘了“食利者卷土重来”，即金融市场的需求剥夺了企业积累生产资本的手段，并产生了连锁反应，降低了增长和减少了就业。另一种解释是，公司治理的变革促使管理者放弃战后时期的行为，减少对生产的投资，优先考虑金融投资和并购业务。\n\n我们将看到，这两个假设不足以解释这一现象，因为它们都忽略了一个基本维度——全球化与金融化之间的症结，它将生产流程的国际化与非金融公司金融支付和收入的增加联系在一起。\n\n第八章 无须积累的利润之谜\n\nII\n\n141","previous_page":178,"next_page":180}